You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 3, September 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to Ingredients of Vehicles

A "Vehicle Tray" for Patch Testing

Alexander A. Fisher, MD; Frances Pascher, MD; Norman B. Kanof, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1971;104(3):286-290.


Abstract

One hundred patients suspected of having allergic eczematous contact dermatitis due to topically administered medications were patch tested with a "vehicle tray" composed of 15 substances commonly found in vehicles of current preparations. Positive tests were obtained in 30 of 100 patients. There were 18 reactions to ethylenediamine; 6 to lanolin; 3 to parabens; 2 each to phenylmercuric acetate, thimerosal, dichlorophene, propylene glycol monostearate, and triethanolamine; 1 to sorbic acid for a total of 40 positive reactions. Vehicles play a significant role in producing sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis. The importance of testing with a standard concentration of each ingredient in preference to the total formulation is shown by the sizable incidence of false-negative reactions with the total formulation.



Author Affiliations

New York

From the Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 14, 1971.

Reprint requests to 45-14 48th St, Woodside, NY 11377 (Dr. Fisher).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

"Inactive" Ingredients in Pharmaceutical Products: Update (Subject Review)
Committee on Drugs
Pediatrics 1997;99:268-278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute and Chronic Conjunctivitis Due to Over-the-counter Ophthalmic Decongestants
Soparkar et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:34-38.
ABSTRACT  

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Propylene Glycol and Polypropylene Glycols
International Journal of Toxicology 1994;13:437-491.
ABSTRACT  

5 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetyl Alcohol, Isostearyl Alcohol, Myristyl Alcohol, and Behenyl Alcohol
International Journal of Toxicology 1988;7:359-413.
ABSTRACT  

8 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Triethanolamine, Diethanolamine, and Monoethanolamine
International Journal of Toxicology 1983;2:183-235.
ABSTRACT  

0.1% Triamcinolone Acetonide Ointment and Patch Test Responses
Clark and Rietschel
Arch Dermatol 1982;118:163-165.
ABSTRACT  

Contact Dermatitis Due to Multiple Corticosteroid Creams
Coskey
Arch Dermatol 1978;114:115-117.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Ethyl Sebacate in Haloprogin Cream
Berlin and Miller
Arch Dermatol 1976;112:1563-1564.
ABSTRACT  

Generalized Exfoliative Dermatitis From Ethylenediamine: Sensitization and Induction
Petrozzi and Shore
Arch Dermatol 1976;112:525-526.
ABSTRACT  

Contact Dermatitis From Stearyl Alcohol and Propylene Glycol in Fluocinonide Cream
Shore and Shelley
Arch Dermatol 1974;109:397-399.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Reaction to Feminine Hygiene Sprays
Fisher
Arch Dermatol 1973;108:801-802.
ABSTRACT  

The Detection of Lanolin Allergy
Epstein
Arch Dermatol 1972;106:678-681.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Contact Sensitivity to Benzalkonium Chloride: Cutaneous, Ophthalmic, and General Medical Implications
Fisher and Stillman
Arch Dermatol 1972;106:169-171.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.