You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 2, February 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Inhibition of Induction of Human Contact Sensitization by Topical Glucocorticosteroids

William M. Burrows, MD; Richard B. Stoughton, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1976;112(2):175-178.


Abstract



• Ten healthy human volunteers were exposed to a primary sensitizing dose of 1 mg dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) by an open topical technique within an area that had been pretreated with a potent topical glucocorticosteroid compound. Quantitative elicitation testing was performed on the opposite side by an open patch test technique two weeks after the sensitizing application. One (10%) of the ten subjects became sensitized. A matched control group of ten subjects was similarly sensitized without steroid treatment. Eight (80%) of the ten became sensitized.

One month later, five of the eight test subjects in whom sensitization had been prevented were retested in an identical fashion without steroid pretreatment, to determine if any degree of tolerance had been induced. All five subjects became sensitized.

Topical glucocorticosteroids inhibited the development of sensitization to topically applied DNCB. Tolerance was not induced by this single process.

(Arch Dermatol 112:175-178, 1976)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Dermatology and Clinical Investigation Center, Naval Regional Medical Center, San Diego (Dr Burrows), and the Division of Dermatology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, Calif (Dr Stoughton).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 15, 1975.

Reprint requests to the Scripps Clinic, 476 Prospect St, La Jolla, CA 92037 (Dr Stoughton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

0.1% Triamcinolone Acetonide Ointment and Patch Test Responses
Clark and Rietschel
Arch Dermatol 1982;118:163-165.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1976 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.