 |
 |

Dependence of Corticosteroid Penetration on the Vehicle
Machiel K. Polano, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1976;112(5):675-680.
Abstract
The penetration of corticosteroids through epidermal membranes in vitro proved to be better when the corticosteroid was dissolved in, or salicylic acid was added to, the vehicle. Hydrocortisone 17 butyrate (HCB) penetration from an ethanolic solution or a vehicle containing propylene glycol (PG) exceeds the penetration from an oil-in-water (O/W) cream or a petrolatum-polyethylene base (Plastibase), both without PG. The addition of PG led to higher penetration from a cream containing 0.2% HCB as compared with that from one containing 0.1% HCB. When the atmosphere on the donor side of the chamber was kept dry with a molecular sieve, the penetration from an O/W cream containing PG was enhanced, whereas that from an O/W cream without PG was substantially diminished.
(Arch Dermatol 112:675-680, 1976)
Author Affiliations
Maria Ponec
From the Department of Dermatology, University of Leiden, University Hospital, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Aug 8, 1975.
Read before the 95th meeting of the American Dermatological Association, West Palm Beach, Fla, March 20, 1975.
Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Leiden, University Hospital, Leiden, the Netherlands (Dr Polano).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Safety Assessment of Salicylic Acid, Butyloctyl Salicylate, Calcium Salicylate, C12-15 Alkyl Salicylate, Capryloyl Salicylic Acid, Hexyldodecyl Salicylate, Isocetyl Salicylate, Isodecyl Salicylate, Magnesium Salicylate, MEA-Salicylate, Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Potassium Salicylate, Methyl Salicylate, Myristyl Salicylate, Sodium Salicylate, TEA-Salicylate, and Tridecyl Salicylate
International Journal of Toxicology 2003;22:1-108.
ABSTRACT
Effect of Salicylic Acid on the Percutaneous Absorption of Hydrocortisone: In Vivo Studies in the Rhesus Monkey
Wester et al.
Arch Dermatol 1978;114:1162-1164.
ABSTRACT
|