You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 10, October 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Photocontact Dermatitis to Halogenated Salicylanilides and Related Compounds

Our Experience Between 1967 and 1975

Stephen Z. Smith, MD; John H. Epstein, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(10):1372-1374.


Abstract

• We evaluated the role of the halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds in the development of photocontact dermatitis between 1967 and 1975 as seen at the University of California, San Francisco clinic. During this period positive photopatch tests to at least one of these chemicals were detected in 98 patients. Prior to 1967, tetrachlorosalicylanilide and the brominated salicylanilides were the most common offenders. Declines occurred in number of patients with positive photopatch tests and patch tests to these agents as well as the number of patients tested to these agents during this period; ie, almost three times as many people were tested and four times as many had positive photopatch tests in the last six months of 1967 as compared to the first nine months of 1975. The most striking reduction in numbers of patients with positive tests occurred after 1968, but the most notable reduction in the total number of positive photopatch tests occurred after 1970. We concluded that these results were most likely due to removal from the market of the more potent photosensitizing chemicals and increased physician familiarity with the disease process.

(Arch Dermatol 113:1372-1374, 1977)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 9, 1977.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Epstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Safety Assessment of Dichlorophene and Chlorophene
International Journal of Toxicology 2004;23:1-27.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Clinical Spectrum of the Persistent Light Reactor
Kaidbey and Messenger
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1441-1448.
ABSTRACT  

Photosensitivity Reaction to Dibucaine: Case Report and Experimental Induction
Horio
Arch Dermatol 1979;115:986-987.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.