You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 10, October 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (53)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Induction of Drug Photosensitization in Man After Parenteral Exposure to Hematoporphyrin

Gregory L. Zalar, MD; Maureen Poh-Fitzpatrick, MD; David L. Krohn, MD; Roger Jacobs, PhD; Leonard C. Harber, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(10):1392-1397.


Abstract

• Two patients had acute phototoxic reactions after intravenous injections of hematoporphyrin (7 mg/kg) and exposure to light. These reactions were characterized by pain, redness, and swelling of affected sites. Controlled clinical studies were instituted using known types and amounts of light to ascertain the degree of photosensitvity at various time intervals after drug administration. In addition, action spectrum studies elicited a peak response at 405 nm ( ± 5 nm). Plasma hematoporphyrin concentration was approximately 520 µg/100 ml one hour after hematoporphyrin infusion and it gradually declined during a period of 42 days with a biphasic diminution that suggested the existence of at least two pools of hematoporphyrin with half-life decay times of 16 hours and 12 days.

βcarotene was administered to ascertain whether or not the phototoxic response could be modified. It is suggested that a degree of protection was obtained that was insufficient to protect the patient.

(Arch Dermatol 113:1392-1397, 1977)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 1, 1977.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr Zalar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Response of Black and White Guinea Pig Skin to Photodynamic Treatment Using 514-nm Light and Dihematoporphyrin Ether
Bernstein et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:1303-1307.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.