You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Phototoxicity Occurring During the Manufacture of Ultraviolet-Cured Ink

Edward A. Emmett, MB, BS; Barbara R. Taphorn; John R. Kominsky, MS

Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(6):770-775.


Abstract

• Four workers employed in the manufacture of ultraviolet-cured inks complained of photosensitivity characterized by an intense burning sensation during sun exposure. Three of these workers developed dermatitis on exposed areas following sun exposure. Six compounds used as photoinitiators in the ink formulations were found to absorb solar ultraviolet radiation. Two preparations of mixed isomers (ortho and para) of amyl dimethylaminobenzoate were found to be phototoxic to Ehrlich ascites cells in vitro and to produce diphasic phototoxic reactions in vivo after topical application on symptomatic workers, asymptomatic workers, or previously unexposed subjects. These responses could be prevented in two subjects by the application of a 10% sulizobenzone sunscreen prior to sun exposure. Two other photoinitiators, Michler's ketone and thioxanthone were phototoxic in vitro but not after topical application in vivo.

(Arch Dermatol 113:770-775, 1977)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, (Dr Emmett and Ms Taphorn), and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Mr Kominsky), Cincinnati.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 15, 1976.

Reprint requests to Department of Environmental Health, Room 5251, College of Medicine, 231 Bethesda Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267 (Dr Emmett).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

2 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Benzophenones-1, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 11
International Journal of Toxicology 1983;2:35-77.
ABSTRACT  

Phototoxicity to a Sunscreen Ingredient: Padimate A
Kaidbey and Kligman
Arch Dermatol 1978;114:547-549.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.