You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 11, November 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Wound Healing

The Effects of Topical Antimicrobial Agents

Roy G. Geronemus, MD; Patricia M. Mertz; William H. Eaglstein, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(11):1311-1314.


Abstract

The effect of four commonly used topical antimicrobial agents on the rate of reepithelialization of clean wounds was evaluated in white domestic pigs. Neosporin Ointment was found to significantly increase the rate of reepithelialization by 25%, while Furacin significantly retarded the healing rate by 24%. Pharmadine, a preparation containing povidone-iodine, did not affect the rate of healing. Both Silvadene and its vehicle significantly increased the rate of reepithelialization by 28% and 21%, respectively. The effects of these agents cannot be explained on the basis of their antimicrobial activity.

(Arch Dermatol 115:1311-1314, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Miami School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 25, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016250, Miami, FL 33101 (Dr Eaglstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Wound Healing
Kirsner
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1318-1319.
FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Perioperative Infection
Fletcher et al.
JBJS 2007;89:1605-1618.
FULL TEXT  

Infection and Allergy Incidence in Ambulatory Surgery Patients Using White Petrolatum vs Bacitracin Ointment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Smack et al.
JAMA 1996;276:972-977.
ABSTRACT  

Topical Antibiotics in Dermatology
Hirschmann
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1691-1700.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Leg Ulcers With Hydrocolloid Occlusive Dressing
Friedman and Su
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1329-1336.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of a Semiocclusive Dressing on the Microbial Population in Superficial Wounds
Mertz and Eaglstein
Arch Surg 1984;119:287-289.
ABSTRACT  

A New In Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Topical Antiseptics on Superficial Wounds: The Effect of 70% Alcohol and Povidone-Iodine Solution
Mertz et al.
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:58-62.
ABSTRACT  

Benzoyl Peroxide and Epidermal Wound Healing
Alvarez et al.
Arch Dermatol 1983;119:222-225.
ABSTRACT  

Inhibition of Rat Skin Ornithine Decarboxylase by Nitrofurazone
Lesiewicz and Goldsmith
Arch Dermatol 1980;116:1225-1226.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.