 |
 |

Mal de Meleda Treated With 13-cis Retinoic Acid
Michael L. Reed, MD;
John Stanley, MD;
Fernando Stengel, MD;
Jerome L. Shupack, MD;
David M. Benjamin, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(5):605-608.
Abstract
Identical twins with mal de Meleda, a rare genodermatosis, displayed the characteristic "glove and sock" hyperkeratosis, hyperhidrosis, and malodor. Their parents, who are first cousins, are unaffected and originated from Calabria, Italy, which is not far from Meleda (Mljet). The disorder is probably transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait. Previous therapy with grenz rays, topical preparations of adrenocorticosteroids, lactic acid, retinoic acid, and bland emollients had been unsuccessful. One of the twins was treated with 13-cis retinoic acid taken by mouth for 16 weeks with dramatic improvement. The major adverse effect was cheilitis, which did not force discontinuation of the treatment.
(Arch Dermatol 115:605-608, 1979)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, Division of Dermatopharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York (Drs Reed, Stanley, Stengel, and Shupack), and Department of Medical Research, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc, Nutley, NJ (Dr Benjamin).
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Dec 5, 1978.
Reprint requests to Section of Dermatopharmacology, Skin and Cancer Unit, New York University Medical Center, 566 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 (Dr Reed).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Clinical and Genetic Studies of 3 Large, Consanguineous, Algerian Families With Mal de Meleda
Bouadjar et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1247-1252.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pachyonychia Congenita: Electron Microscopic and Epidermal Glycoprotein Assessment Before and During Isotretinoin Treatment
Thomas et al.
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1475-1479.
ABSTRACT
Successful Treatment of Keratoderma Hereditaria Mutilans With an Aromatic Retinoid
Pang et al.
Arch Dermatol 1981;117:225-228.
ABSTRACT
Retinoids, Cancer, and the Skin
Elias and Williams
Arch Dermatol 1981;117:160-180.
ABSTRACT
|