 |
 |

Congenital Self-healing HistiocytosisClinical, Histologic, and Ultrastructural Study
Ernesto Bonifazi, MD;
Ruggero Caputo, MD;
Adriana Ceci, MD;
Carlo Meneghini, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1982;118(4):267-272.
Abstract
In a typical case of congenital self-healing histiocytosis of the Hashimoto-Pritzker type, the results of an ultrastructural examination of a nodule of a 30-day-old patient showed that about 25% of the cells contained Langerhans' granules and that approximately 40% of the cells contained unique phagosomes but no regularly laminated bodies. This case of congenital self-healing histiocytosis is an example of concurrent proliferation of two types of histiocytes (one with and one without Langerhans' granules). Since transitional forms were not observed, this finding might indicate the existence of congenital, self-healing forms of histiocytosis X.
(Arch Dermatol 1982;118:267-272)
Author Affiliations
From the Clinics of Dermatology (Drs Bonifazi and Meneghini) and Pediatrics (Dr Ceci), University of Bari, Italy; and the Clinic of Dermatology, Institute of Pharmacology, University of Milan, Italy (Dr Caputo).
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 30, 1980.
Reprint requests to Clinica Dermatologica, Università di Milano, Via Pace 9, 20122 Milan, Italy (Dr Caputo).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Case 30-2007 -- A Newborn Girl with Skin Lesions
Avram et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1327-1335.
FULL TEXT
Solitary Congenital Indeterminate Cell Histiocytoma
Levisohn et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:81-85.
ABSTRACT
An Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Study of an Unusual Case of Multiple Non-X Histiocytoma
Shimizu et al.
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1254-1257.
ABSTRACT
Diffuse Cutaneous Reticulohistiocytosis in a Child With Tuberous Sclerosis
Caputo et al.
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:567-570.
ABSTRACT
Solitary Langerhans Cell Histiocytoma
Taieb et al.
Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1033-1037.
ABSTRACT
Primary Histiocytic Dermatoses
Ringel and Moschella
Arch Dermatol 1985;121:1531-1541.
ABSTRACT
|