You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 8, August 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Epidemiology of Work-Related Skin Disease in South Carolina

Julian E. Keil, DPH; Edward Shmunes, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1983;119(8):650-654.


Abstract

• Problems associated with occupationally related skin disease were examined by reviewing the charts of all closed cases of skin disease processed by the South Carolina Industrial Commission during the period of July 1, 1978, through June 30, 1979. During the review period, 958 cases occurred that accounted for costs of $142,925 and 2,100 days lost from work. Through the use of selected objective criteria, only 15% of these cases were defined as serious, but they accounted for 48% of all dollar costs and 96% of the total lost time. Similarly, with the use of a percentile approach to estimate severity, persons in the upper fifth percentile of cost elements were responsible for 68% of the total incurred fees and 77% of the lost time. Eighty-eight percent of all claimants said their hands were affected by their skin problem. Almost 13% of the claimants reported that their entire skin surface was involved. There was a significant clustering of cases from June through September among male claimants, but no seasonal incidence was observed in female claimants. We conclude that the identification of factors that characterize the small number of cases with disproportionate economic impact deserves greater attention and investigation.

(Arch Dermatol 1983;119:650-654)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Keil) and the Environmental Health Sciences (Dr Shmunes), College of Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 2, 1983.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Leads from the MMWR
JAMA 1986;256:2311-2321.
 

The Cost of Occupational Skin Disease
Mathias
Arch Dermatol 1985;121:332-334.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.