 |
 |

Transfer of Topically Applied Tetracycline in Various Vehicles
Richard Johnson, MD;
Bernard P. Nusbaum, MD;
Stephen N. Horwitz, MD;
Phillip Frost, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1983;119(8):660-663.
Abstract
Fifty hospitalized dermatology patients participated in a study to evaluate the transfer of topically applied tetracycline hydrochloride-containing fluorescent ointments, creams, lotions, and tinctures from various sites of application. Patients were examined with a Wood's lamp 24 hours after application to determine the sites and areas of transfer. The topically applied medications did not remain confined to sites of initial application. The anatomic sites of initial application determined the pattern of transfer. Certain patterns of transfer were characteristic among groups of patients and for specific patients. The vehicle of the topical preparation greatly influenced the extent and sites of transfer.
(Arch Dermatol 1983;119:660-663)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Fla.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Aug 6, 1982.
Presented at the 107th annual meeting of the Florida Medical Association, Hollywood, Fla, May 2, 1981, and the ninth annual midwinter assembly of American Physicians Fellowship, Inc, Hollywood, Fla, Feb 26, 1982.
Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140 (Dr Johnson).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Self-application of a Protective Cream: Pitfalls of Occupational Skin Protection
Wigger-Alberti et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:861-864.
ABSTRACT
Exogenous Origin of n-Alkanes in Pathologic Scale
Williams et al.
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:1065-1071.
ABSTRACT
Are Topical Corticosteroids Useful Adjunctive Therapy for the Treatment of Psoriasis With Ultraviolet Radiation? A Review of the Literature
Meola et al.
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1708-1713.
ABSTRACT
n-Alkanes in the Skin-Reply
Elias and Williams
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1728-1728.
ABSTRACT
|