You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 1, January 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A New In Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Topical Antiseptics on Superficial Wounds

The Effect of 70% Alcohol and Povidone-Iodine Solution

Patricia M. Mertz; Oscar M. Alvarez, PhD; Richard V. Smerbeck; William H. Eaglstein, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(1):58-62.


Abstract

• A preliminary evaluation of the antiseptic activity of 70% alcohol and 10% povidone-iodine solution was carried out in an animal model. After the inoculation of partial-thickness wounds with Staphylococcus aureus, 0.1 mL of the antiseptic agent (70% alcohol or povidone-iodine solution) was rubbed into the wound for 30 s. The agent was left on the wound for one minute, three minutes, and 24 hours, and then the wounds were cultured for bacteria. After one minute, the treatments did not reduce the number of pathogens. After three minutes, both 70% alcohol and povidone-iodine solution produced a slight reduction, and after 24 hours, povidone-iodine solution slightly reduced the number of pathogenic bacteria that could be cultured. However, after 24 hours, neither agent reduced the number of pathogens below 105 colony-forming units per milliliter. These preliminary data suggest that single applications of 70% alcohol or povidone-iodine may have very limited efficacy as antiseptic agents for the treatment of superficial wounds.

(Arch Dermatol 1984;120:58-62)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 2, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, RC-513 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (Ms Mertz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Wound Healing
Kirsner
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1318-1319.
FULL TEXT  

A Critical Discussion of the Use of Antiseptics in Acute Traumatic Wounds
Smith
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2005;95:148-153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Povidone-Iodine in Polyethylene Oxide Hydrogel Dressing: Effect on Multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus in Partial-Thickness Wounds
Mertz et al.
Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1133-1138.
ABSTRACT  

Topical Antiseptics
Leyden
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1419-1419.
ABSTRACT  

Inadequacies in a Wound Infection Study-Reply
MERTZ and EAGLSTEIN
Arch Surg 1984;119:1348-1348.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.