You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 3, March 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Modified Goeckerman Therapy for Psoriasis

A Two-Year Follow-up of a Combined Hospital-Ambulatory Care Program

Robert B. Armstrong, MD; Eileen E. Leach, RN; Joseph L. Fleiss, PhD; Leonard C. Harber, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(3):313-318.


Abstract

• Two groups totaling 162 patients hospitalized for modified Goeckerman treatment of severe psoriasis were matched for sex, age, and season of admission and followed up for two years after discharge. One group remained hospitalized throughout their average 20.8-day course; the other half was hospitalized 14 days, then transferred to an ambulatory center for the remainder of a course averaging 20.8 days. No difference was detected between the groups in the duration that improvement equaled or exceeded progress achieved at discharge. The percentage of patients remaining continuously improved after discharge was 80% at one month, 55% at six months, 40% at 12 months, and 20% at 24 months. Rates of relapse requiring readmission or alternate therapy were also similar: 75% had not relapsed by 12 months and 60% had not relapsed by 24 months.

(Arch Dermatol 1984;120:313-318)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons (Drs Armstrong and Harber, and Ms Leach), the Dermatology Service of Presbyterian Hospital (Drs Armstrong and Harber) and the Division of Biostatistics, Columbia University, School of Public Health (Dr Fleiss), New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 16, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr Armstrong).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Methotrexate vs Goeckerman Therapy for Psoriasis: A Pilot Study
Chen et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1602-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

UV-B: Unanswered Questions
Stern
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1437-1439.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.