You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 11, November 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Topical Antibiotic Treatment of Impetigo With Mupirocin

Louis D. Eells, DO; Patricia M. Mertz; Yvette Piovanetti, MD; Gary M. Pekoe, PhD; William H. Eaglstein, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1986;122(11):1273-1276.


Abstract

• Because the effectiveness of topical antimicrobials in the treatment of ecthyma, impetigo, and pyoderma is not well established, the US Food and Drug Administration has recently proposed guidelines for tests of topical antimicrobial efficacy in primary skin infections. The guidelines require both comparison with the agent's base and microbiologic documentation of efficacy. These guidelines were followed in this double-blind, eight-day evaluation of impetigo/ecthyma treated with mupirocin, a new agent that is only active topically. All cultures, before and after therapy, were taken using swabs dipped in neutralizing broth plus 10% fetal bovine serum to minimize antimicrobial "carry over" to the culture plate. Staphylococcus aureus, which was isolated from 94% of the patients before therapy, was eliminated in 88% of the mupirocin-treated patients and 47% of the vehicletreated patients. Group A β-hemolytic streptococci were eliminated in 100% of the mupirocin-treated and 0% of the vehicle-treated patients. To our knowledge, this is the first topical antibacterial treatment for primary skin infections proved superior to its vehicle using the proposed US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.

(Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1273-1276)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Drs Eells and Eaglstein and Ms Mertz); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine and San Juan City Hospital (Dr Piovanetti); and Beecham Laboratories, Bristol, Tenn (Dr Pekoe).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 20, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, RC-513 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (Dr Eaglstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impetigo
ESTERLY et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1991;145:125-126.
ABSTRACT  

Topical Mupirocin Treatment of Impetigo Is Equal to Oral Erythromycin Therapy
Mertz et al.
Arch Dermatol 1989;125:1069-1073.
ABSTRACT  

Topical Antibiotics in Dermatology
Hirschmann
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1691-1700.
ABSTRACT  

Mupirocin and the Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis
Luber et al.
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:853-854.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.