 |
 |

Dermatologic Applications of Cyclosporine
therine A. Biren, MD;
Ronald J. Barr, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1986;122(9):1028-1032.
Abstract
It is evident that cyclosporine A is a potent immunosuppressive agent and may become immensely valuable in the treatment of cutaneous disease. The extent of its application and efficacy is speculative, as neither the pathogenesis of many of the diseases, nor the mechanism of action of cyclosporine is fully understood. Well-designed clinical and laboratory studies are necessary to delineate its therapeutic value in a particular disorder. It must be emphasized that the systemic use of the drug is associated with several serious side effects, including nephrotoxicity and lymphoproliferative disease. Local topical application may reduce these concerns, and make treatment of benign diseases a possibility. Therefore, until these well-designed prospective studies are performed, cyclosporine's use should be limited and closely monitored.
(Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1028-1032)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication April 24, 1986.
Reprint requests to Section of Dermal Pathology and Histochemistry, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 101 City Dr S, Orange, CA 92668 (Dr Barr).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Cyclosporine Therapy for Bullous Erythema Multiforme
Wilkel and McDonald
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:397-398.
ABSTRACT
Dermatological Application of Cyclosporine
Balato et al.
Arch Dermatol 1989;125:1430-1431.
ABSTRACT
Topical Application of Cyclosporine on Guinea Pig Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Nakagawa et al.
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:907-910.
ABSTRACT
Cyclosporine and Male-Pattern Alopecia
Picascia and Roenigk
Arch Dermatol 1987;123:1432-1432.
ABSTRACT
Topical Cyclosporine in Alopecia Areata
Parodi and Rebora
Arch Dermatol 1987;123:165-166.
ABSTRACT
Efficacy of Low-Dose Cyclosporine in Severe Atopic Skin Disease
VAN Joost et al.
Arch Dermatol 1987;123:166-167.
ABSTRACT
|