You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  STUDIES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hazard-Rate Analysis in Stage I Malignant Melanoma

Gary S. Rogers, MD; Alfred W. Kopf, MD; Darrell S. Rigel, MD; Robert J. Friedman, MD; Marcia Levenstein, DSc; Robert S. Bart, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1986;122(9):999-1002.


Abstract



• Hazard-rate analysis provides a unique means of assessing prognosis in patients with malignant disease. The hazard rate is the probability of a patient dying within a particular unit of time after definitive therapy. Hazardrate analysis was performed on a series of 719 consecutive patients with clinical stage I cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM). The peak hazard rate for death from metastatic MM occurred during the 48th month of followup. Thereafter, the hazard rate declined and approached zero by the 120th month. When the patients were stratified by the thickness of their primary MM, thicker lesions reached their peak hazard-rate month earlier than thinner lesions. We conclude that after 120-month survival, the risk of dying from MM is virtually zero. However, since rare late deaths from MM occur, lifetime follow-up is recommended.

(Arch Dermatol 1986;122:999-1002)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine; the Oncology Section, Skin and Cancer Unit, University Hospital, New York; and the Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York University Medical Center.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 2, 1986.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Rational Follow-up Recommendations for Patients With Melanoma
Chartier and Bigby
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1145-1148.
FULL TEXT  

Total-Body Photographs of Dysplastic Nevi
Slue et al.
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1239-1243.
ABSTRACT  

Prognosis in Melanoma: What Have We Learned?
Koh
Arch Dermatol 1986;122:993-994.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.