You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 11, November 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PUVA-Induced Blisters, Complement Deposition, and Damage to the Dermoepidermal Junction

Peter S. Friedmann, MD, FRCP; Peter Coburn, MRCP; Michael G. C. Dahl, FRCP; Brian L. Diffey, PhD; James Ross, PhD; Gordon P. Ford, MRCP; Susan C. Parker, MRCP; Prudence Bird, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(11):1471-1477.


Abstract

• We followed the course of 56 patients receiving psoralen plus long-wave ultraviolet light (PUVA) therapy. Nonhemorrhagic blisters developed on clinically normal skin on the limbs of seven patients. Seeming to be related to friction and trauma, the blisters form as a result of damage to the basal and suprabasal layers. Perilesional skin specimens from all blistered patients contained granular deposits of C3 at the dermoepidermal junction, around the upper dermal blood vessels, or at both sites. The average time for initiation and complete formation of suction blisters was measured in 51 patients at different stages during the course of PUVA treatment. Blister separation was in the lamina lucida, with the pemphigoid antigen in the roof while the blister floor contained the lamina densa, laminin, and type IV collagen. This impaired dermoepidermal adhesion was a general phenomenon that occurred in all PUVA-treated patients. The mechanism remains to be determined.

(Arch Dermatol 1987;123:1471-1477)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne (England) (Drs Friedmann, Coburn, Dahl, Diffey, Ross, Ford, Parker, and Bird); Department of Dermatology, Worthing Hospital, Sussex, England (Dr Coburn); Regional Medical Physics Department, Dryburn Hospital, Durham, England (Dr Diffey); Department of Dermatology, University of Edinburgh (Dr Ross); and Dewsbury (England) General Hospital, West Yorkshire (Dr Ford).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 5, 1987.

Reprint requests to the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Department of Dermatology, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Newcastle NE1 4LP, England (Dr Friedmann).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Invisible Dermatoses
Kligman
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1375-1382.
ABSTRACT  

Brunsting-Perry Cicatricial Pemphigoid Precipitated by Trauma
Baldwin and Lynfield
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:911-912.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.