You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 11, November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Same Glucocorticoid in Brand-Name Products

Does Increasing the Concentration Result in Greater Topical Biologic Activity?

Richard B. Stoughton, MD; Karen Wullich, JD

Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(11):1509-1511.


Abstract

• Many topical corticosteroid formulations are available as different concentrations of the steroid in a similar vehicle. We tested the existing assumption that higher concentrations give greater biologic activity. The vasoconstriction assay was used because of its known correlation with clinical activity. Statistical analyses of the different concentrations are as follows: Kenalog creams: 0.025% is equal to 0.1% is equal to 0.5%; Aristocort creams: 0.025% is equal to 0.1% is equal to 0.5%; Aristocort ointments: 0.1% is equal to 0.5%; Aristocort A creams: 0.5% is equal to 0.025% but is less than 0.1%; Hytone cream: 1.0% is equal to 2.5%; Synalar creams: 0.01% is less than 0.025% which is less than 0.2%; Topicort creams: 0.25% is equal 0.05%; and Valisone creams: 0.1% is greater than 0.01%. The assumption that increased concentration of the same steroid in the same vehicle type will give increased biologic activity is usually, but not always, incorrect for brand-name formulations now available.

(Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1509-1511)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 13, 1989.

Reprint requests to Division of Dermatology (M-023C), University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093 (Dr Stoughton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Topical 0.050% Betamethasone Dipropionate: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Dose-Response Studies in Humans
Pershing et al.
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:740-747.
ABSTRACT  

A Double-blind Controlled Comparison of Generic and Trade-Name Topical Steroids Using the Vasoconstriction Assay
Olsen
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:197-201.
ABSTRACT  

`Vasoconstriction'--Skin Blanching--Assay for Glucocorticoids--a Critique
Shah et al.
Arch Dermatol 1989;125:1558-1561.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.