You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 11, November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pruritic Urticarial Papules and Plaques of Pregnancy and Its Relationship to Maternal-Fetal Weight Gain and Twin Pregnancy

Lisa M. Cohen, MD; Eleanor L. Capeless, MD; Paul A. Krusinski, MD; Mary E. Maloney, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(11):1534-1536.


Abstract

• Thirty women who were seen at our institution between 1984 and 1988 for pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP) were retrospectively evaluated and interviewed. We found a significantly increased maternal weight gain and newborn birth weight in patients with PUPPP, compared with age and parity-matched controls. The average weight gain during pregnancy was 18.1 ± 0.9 (SEM) kg for the patients with PUPPP (excluding twin gestations) and 14.6 ± 1.0 kg for the controls. The mean newborn birth weight was 3.6 ± 0.09 kg for the PUPPP group and 3.3 ± 0.08 kg for the control group. There were three twin pregnancies (10%), compared with the twin gestation rate at our institution of 1.6%. Therefore, based on our findings of an increased maternal weight gain and neonatal birth weight, an increased twin rate, and an abdominal eruption that occurs in primigravidas in their third trimester of pregnancy, we suggest that abdominal distention or a reaction to it may play a role in the development of PUPPP.

(Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1534-1536)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 16, 1989.

Reprint requests to 177 St Botolph St, Apt 7, Boston, MA 02116 (Dr Cohen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Specific Pruritic Diseases of Pregnancy: A Prospective Study of 3192 Pregnant Women
Roger et al.
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:734-739.
ABSTRACT  

Specific Dermatoses of Pregnancy: Toward a Comprehensive View?
Borradori and Saurat
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:778-780.
ABSTRACT  

Pruritic Urticarial Papules and Plaques of Pregnancy: Relationship to Maternal Weight Gain and Twin or Triplet Pregnancies
Pauwels et al.
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:801-802.
ABSTRACT  

Parity, Polypregnancy, Paternity, and PUPPP
Powell
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:1551-1551.
ABSTRACT  

Pruritic Urticarial Plaques and Papules of Pregnancy and Skin Distention
Beckett and Goldberg
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:125-126.
ABSTRACT  

Pruritic Urticarial Papules and Plaques of Pregnancy Are Not Related to Maternal or Fetal Weight Gain
Roger et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:1517-1517.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.