You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 12, December 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of the Dose-Response Relationship for Psoralen-UVA Erythema and UVB Erythema

Neil H. Cox, BSc, MRCP; Peter M. Farr, MD, MRCP; Brian L. Diffey, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(12):1653-1657.


Abstract

• Twenty patients with psoriasis were phototested to determine their erythemal responses to UVB and psoralen-UVA (PUVA) (oral 8-methoxypsoralen). The smallest ultraviolet radiation doses to produce erythema (minimal erythema dose and minimal phototoxic dose, respectively) were recorded and dose-response curves were constructed for UVB (24 hours after irradiation) and PUVA (48 hours) using objective measurement. The choice of a 48-hour measurement was validated by phototesting an additional 11 subjects to determine the time course of PUVA erythema. No correlation was demonstrated between minimal erythema dose for UVB, minimal phototoxic dose for PUVA, and sun-reactive skin type. The mean slope of the dose-response curve for UVB erythema was four times steeper than that for PUVA. Psoralen-UVA erythema reached a broad maximum between 48 and 96 hours after irradiation. Using objective methods we have demonstrated that the commonly accepted view of a steep dose-response relationship for PUVA erythema is not valid.

(Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1653-1657)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England (Drs Cox and Farr); and Department of Medical Physics, Dryburn Hospital, Durham, England (Dr Diffey).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 2, 1989.

Presented at the annual meeting of the British Society for Investigative Dermatology, Manchester, England, September 1988.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dose-Response and Time-Course Characteristics of UV-A1 Erythema
Beattie et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1549-1555.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skin Pigmentation as a Predictor of Minimal Phototoxic Dose After Oral Methoxsalen
Bech-Thomsen et al.
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:464-468.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.