You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cyclosporine in Lamellar Ichthyosis

Vincent C. Ho, MD, FRCPC; Aditya K. Gupta, MD; Charles N. Ellis, MD; Kevin D. Cooper, MD; Brian J. Nickoloff, MD, PhD; John J. Voorhees, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(4):511-514.


Abstract

• In an open trial, five patients with lamellar ichthyosis showed no response to four weeks of treatment with oral cyclosporine (cyclosporine A) (6 mg/kg/d). Histologic examination of lamellar ichthyosis revealed hyperkeratosis; psoriasiform acanthosis; dilated, tortuous capillaries; and a slight perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Immunofluorescence studies revealed, in the epidermis, normal numbers of T6+DR+ Langerhans' cells and an absence of T cells and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression. In the papillary dermis, there were prominent capillaries as detected by staining with anti-factor VIII-related antigen. The endothelial cells also expressed large amounts of HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, suggesting that they were activated. Only occasional Langerhans' cells were found in the dermis. Histologic and immunofluorescence findings were unchanged with cyclosporine therapy. The effects of cyclosporine on lamellar ichthyosis are contrasted with those reported for psoriasis. Since lamellar ichthyosis and psoriasis share similar features of epidermal hyperproliferation and the presence of activated, dilated, tortuous vessels, but differ in the lack of immunologic cellular activity, their contrasting response to cyclosporine suggests that the target of the action of cyclosporine is the immune system rather than the keratinocyte or the endothelium. However, other factors may have to be considered.

(Arch Dermatol 1989;125:511-514)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Ho, Gupta, Ellis, Cooper, Nickoloff, and Voorhees) and Pathology (Dr Nickoloff), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, and the Dermatology Service, Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Hospital (Dr Cooper). Dr Ho is now a fellow with the Department of Dermatology, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 31, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Room 1910 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0314 (Dr Voorhees).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Oral Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Dermatoses: A Clinical and Immunopathologic Analysis
Gupta et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:339-350.
ABSTRACT  

Cyclosporine: An Immunosuppressant Affecting Epithelial Cell Proliferation
Kanitakis and Thivolet
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:369-375.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.