You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 8, August 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (85)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Development of Expertise in Dermatology

Geoffrey R. Norman, PhD; Donald Rosenthal, MD; Lee R. Brooks, PhD; Scott W. Allen, MS; Linda J. Muzzin, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(8):1063-1068.


Abstract

• To examine the development of expertise in dermatology, accuracy of diagnosis and response times of subjects at five levels of expertise were assessed. A total of 100 slides, 2 typical and 3 atypical slides from each of 20 common skin disorders, were presented to six subjects at each of the following levels: second-year preclinical medical students, final year medical students, residents in family medicine, general practitioners, and dermatologists. Accuracy of diagnosis rose from 21% for medical students to 87% for dermatologists. Correct diagnosis was associated with a decrease in response time with expertise, whereas errors were associated with a dramatic increase in response time, and was slower than correct response times at all levels, suggesting that errors do not result predominantly from carelessness or speed. Typical slides accounted for a constant proportion of diagnostic errors at all higher levels of expertise, and experts continued to make a significant proportion of errors on slides shown to be relatively easy for residents. The results are shown to be at variance with any model that equates expertise with the mastery of complex rules, but they are consistent with models of expertise that propose that expertise is equated with a rapid "patternrecognition" process, and errors result from unintended confusion with previous similar examples.

(Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1063-1068)



Author Affiliations

From McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 1, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5 (Dr Norman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Differences in biopsy techniques of actinic keratoses by plastic surgeons and dermatologists: a histologically controlled pilot study.
Sellheyer and Bergfeld
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:455-459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Right Picture Is Worth a Thousand Numbers: Data Displays in Anesthesia
Drews and Westenskow
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2006;48:59-71.
ABSTRACT  

Does clinical experience make up for failure to keep up to date?
Norman and Eva
Evid. Based Med. 2005;10:66-68.
FULL TEXT  

Using Clinical Outcomes to Identify Expert Physical Therapists
Resnik and Hart
ptjournal 2003;83:990-1002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of Visual Diagnostic Expertise in Pathology - An Information-processing Study
Crowley et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10:39-51.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Primer on Aspects of Cognition for Medical Informatics
Patel et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2001;8:324-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Dermatologic Diagnoses by Primary Care Practitioners and Dermatologists: A Review of the Literature
Federman et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:170-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Diagnostic Yield of Histologic Examination of Seborrheic Keratoses
Eads et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1417-1420.
ABSTRACT  

Primary Care Physicians as Gatekeepers in Managed Care: Primary Care Physicians' and Dermatologists' Skills at Secondary Prevention of Skin Cancer
Gerbert et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:1030-1038.
ABSTRACT  

Learning and Teaching in Dermatology: A Practitioner's Guide
Brodell et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:946-952.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of the Part-time Physician-Teacher in Dermatology
Brodell
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:758-760.
ABSTRACT  

On a Clear Day You Can See Forever
Jackson
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1151-1153.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Seborrheic Keratosis-Reply
Stern and Arndt
JAMA 1991;265:2192-2193.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Accuracy and Appropriateness of Care for Seborrheic Keratoses: A Pilot Study of an Approach to Quality Assurance for Cutaneous Surgery
Stern et al.
JAMA 1991;265:74-77.
ABSTRACT  

Accuracy in the Clinical Diagnosis of Malignant Melanoma
Grin et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:763-766.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.