You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 8, August 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An Argument for Circumcision

Prevention of Balanitis in the Adult

Norma Fakjian, MD; Steven Hunter, MD; Gary W. Cole, MD; Jerry Miller, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1990;126(8):1046-1047.


Abstract

• A cross-sectional study and a retrospective study were performed to determine the frequency of balanitis in a randomly selected group of dermatology patients. A total of 398 subjects were included in the cross-sectional study, 213 (53.5%) of whom had been circumcised. Balanitis was diagnosed in 2.3% of circumcised men and in 12.5% of uncircumcised men. In patients with diabetes mellitus, balanitis occurred with a prevalence of 34.8% in the uncircumcised population, compared with 0% in the circumcised population. Balanitis did occur with increased frequency in the diabetic population (16%), regardless of circumcision status, compared with the nondiabetic population (5.8%). Of 63 circumcisions performed at our institution between 1987 and 1989, 28.6% were for the treatment of balanitis; 44.4%, for phimosis (which was probably induced by chronic balanitis); 19%, in preparation for placement of penile prostheses; and 8%, for miscellaneous reasons. No complications of circumcision were reported. In this group of patients, balanitis was more frequent in diabetic than in nondiabetic uncircumcised men (50% vs 15.4%).

(Arch Dermatol. 1990;126:1046-1047)



Author Affiliations

From the Dermatology and Surgical Services, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, Calif, and the Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine. Dr Hunter is now with the Department of Internal Medicine, Marshfield (Wis) Clinic.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 7, 1990.

Reprint requests to Dermatology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 5901 E Seventh St, Long Beach, CA 90822 (Dr Cole).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Case Study: Postsexual Penile Ulcer as a Symptom of Diabetes
Lauder and Binienda
Clin. Diabetes 2005;23:191-192.
FULL TEXT  

Circumcision Policy Statement
Task Force on Circumcision
Pediatrics 1999;103:686-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.