You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 3, March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  STUDIES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Efficiency of Opaque Photoprotective Agents in the Visible Light Range

Elaine T. Kaye, MD; Jay A. Levin, MD; Irvin H. Blank, PhD; Kenneth A. Arndt, MD; R. Rox Anderson, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(3):351-355.


Abstract



• "Opaque" physical sunscreens are important for photoprotection of individuals with visible light and UV-A photosensitivity such as those with porphyria, drug photoallergy, and polymorphous light eruption. Diffuse spectral transmittance of various thicknesses of opaque sunscreen formulations were measured from 350- to 800-nm range using a spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere. Transmission through 20% zinc oxide paste was high and decreased minimally despite large increases in the sunscreen layer thickness. Adding a visible light absorber such as iron oxide to scattering sunscreens, however, substantially lowered transmittance below that predicted by the product of the transmittances for each component alone. Opaque sunscreens protected against hematoporphyrin derivative photosensitization of albino guinea pig skin; these results were quantitatively consistent with the in vitro findings. Poor photoprotection against visible light is obtained with white paste sunscreens, even if thick layers are applied. The addition of pigments to such sunscreens, however, greatly enhances photoprotection and cosmetic acceptability.

(Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-355)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Dermatology, Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine and Massachusetts General Hospital, The Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass. Dr Levin is now in private practice in Atlanta, Ga.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication October 30, 1990.

Reprint requests to Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Wellman-2, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Anderson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Local therapy for cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus: practical and theoretical considerations
Ting and Sontheimer
Lupus 2001;10:171-184.
ABSTRACT  

The Absorption Properties of "Physical" Sunscreens
Kollias
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:209-210.
FULL TEXT  

Durable Protection Against Long-Wavelength UV-A Radiation and Blue Light
Johnson
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:409-409.
ABSTRACT  

Durable Protection Against Long-Wavelength UV-A Radiation and Blue Light-Reply
Kaye et al.
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:409-409.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.