You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  OBSERVATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dermal Granulomatous Inflammation to Cornified Cells

Significance Near Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Barry Leshin, MD; Elizabeth H. Prichard, MD; Wain L. White, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1992;128(5):649-652.


Abstract

{dagger} Background.—
Discrimination of benign from malignant is fundamental to accurate histologic diagnosis. This article describes a series of nine patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who were noted to have in the vicinity of their neoplasm seemingly benign but biologically significant dermal granulomatous inflammation to cornified cells (GRC).

Observations.— —
Two patients were reported as having this finding alone on incisional biopsy specimens only to have subsequent biopsy specimens demonstrate bona fide malignant neoplasms. On Mohs' frozen sections, four patients were noted to have GRC without concomitant tumor and four patients had GRC admixed with tumor. Two patients who demonstrated GRC but no neoplasm on final Mohs' sections had development of recurrent neoplasm after the initial procedure.

Conclusions.—
In the setting of suspected or proved cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, GRC signifies the presence of viable neoplasm and warrants additional tissue resection.

(Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:649-652)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Leshin and White), Otolaryngology (Dr Leshin), and Pathology (Drs Prichard and White), Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 13, 1991.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, Orlando, Fla, March 12, 1991.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1071 (Dr Leshin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

On the Definition of Mohs Surgery and How It Determines Appropriate Surgical Margins
Rapini
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:673-678.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.