You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  OBSERVATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Importance of Proper Vehicle Selection in the Detection of Minoxidil Sensitivity

S. Elizabeth Whitmore, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1992;128(5):653-656.


Abstract

• Background.—
The correct selection of vehicles for patch testing specific substances is essential in the evaluation of suspected allergic contact dermatitis. A reaction to a chemical may be dependent not only on the concentration tested but also on the vehicle in which it is tested. In cases of suspected allergic contact dermatitis to minoxidil, propylene glycol, and alcohol formulations, patch testing is usually done with the formulation of minoxidil in alcohol and/or minoxidil in petrolatum.

Observations.—
An acute contact dermatitis of the scalp developed in a 34-year-old white man while he was using minoxidil (Rogaine [2% minoxidil in a solution of alcohol 60% vol/vol, propylene glycol, and water]) solution. Patch testing with 2% minoxidil in alcohol and 2% minoxidil in petrolatum showed no reaction, while both Rogaine solution and 2% minoxidil in propylene glycol produced papulovesicular plaques.

Conclusions.—
Patch testing in cases of suspected minoxidil allergic contact dermatitis should include testing with minoxidil in propylene glycol. Omitting this testing may cause diagnoses and therapeutic formulation alternatives to go unrecognized.

(Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:653-656)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 31, 1991.

Read in part before the Contact Dermatitis Meeting, Atlanta, Ga, November 30, 1990.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Patch Test as an Exercise in Cutaneous Pharmacokinetics: Does Compound Allergy Exist?
Rietschel
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:678-679.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.