• Online Features  This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (51)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Overview, Relevance to Dermatology, and Strategies for Coping

Kenneth A. Arndt, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1992;128(9):1249-1256.

Abstract

Background.—
The amount of biomedical information contained in scientific journals has grown to the point that complete coverage of this material is impossible. The number of articles and journals being published has been growing at an exponential rate since 1750. Thirty-four thousand references from 4000 journals are added each month to the National Library of Medicine MEDLINE database from among the more than 100 000 scientific journals now published. This increase in scientific literature reflects not greater productivity but simply a larger number of scientists at work. Most articles written are eventually published in the medical literature, but a large number of scientific articles are of less than optimal quality, and most scientific articles that are published are never cited. Articles of higher quality and usefulness cluster in a few journals that enjoy great use in medical libraries and high scores on bibliometric scores such as the Science Citation Index.

Observations.—
To assess the reading habits of dermatologic trainees and evaluate how they cope with this information excess, a survey was distributed to 36 residents in three training programs. The average number of medical journal reading hours per month was 17; the number of hours devoted to reading issues of the Archives of Dermatology, the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, and the Journal of Investigative Dermatology were 3.2, 5.0, and 1.4, respectively; and the average resident read seven peerreviewed journals, two to four dermatologic tabloids, and four peer-reviewed medical journals.

Conclusions.—
Critically and consistently reading a limited number of high-quality peer-reviewed journals as well as taking advantage of information available through computer networks and bibliographic and full-text databases is the best approach to coping with the volume of medical literature. Translating this information into a change in attitude and modification of physician behavior is best accomplished when local role models incorporate new ideas into their practice and teaching. Modifications that would, in fact, bring about truly useful changes, such as decreasing the number of new publications, melding journals already present into smaller numbers of publications rather than instituting new journals, altering the "publish-or-perish" rules, and writing more comprehensive articles rather than multiple small contributions, all await fundamental alterations in longaccepted policies in medicine.

(Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1249-1256)

Author Affiliations

Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Arndt).

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: a quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media
Suleski and Ibaraki
Public Understanding of Science 2010;19:115-125.
ABSTRACT  

Automatically Identifying Health Outcome Information in MEDLINE Records
Demner-Fushman et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:52-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Appraisal of Dermatology Residency Training: A Canadian Study
Freiman et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1100-1104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry
BADER and ISMAIL
Journal of the American Dental Association 2004;135:464-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles
Lee et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2805-2808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Read the Lancet, or Else!
Bernhard
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:602-605.
FULL TEXT  

Paradigm Lost
Bigby
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:26-27.
FULL TEXT  

The Renaissance of Dermatology: Selected Concepts Beyond the Skin
Lotti
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:69-70.
FULL TEXT  

Classic and Near-Classic Articles in the Dermatologic Literature
Stern and Arndt
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:948-950.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contempo New and Now: Updates Linking Evidence and Experience
Siegel
JAMA 1998;279:1395-1396.
FULL TEXT  

Learning and Teaching in Dermatology: A Practitioner's Guide
Brodell et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:946-952.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Dermatology Journals
Dubin and Arndt
Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1059-1060.
ABSTRACT  

How Are Internal Medicine Residency Journal Clubs Organized, and What Makes Them Successful?
Sidorov
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1193-1197.
ABSTRACT  

Peering at the Dermatology Literature
Arndt and Dubin
Arch Dermatol 1995;131:602-603.
ABSTRACT  

A Case of Telangiectasis of Unusual Development
MORROW
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:160-160.
ABSTRACT  

Citation Classics in Clinical Dermatologic Journals: Citation Analysis, Biomedical Journals, and Landmark Articles, 1945-1990
Dubin et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1121-1129.
ABSTRACT  

The Archives and the Compression Generation
Springer
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1024-1025.
ABSTRACT  

Faust Meets the Publication Explosion
Buchman
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:246-246.
ABSTRACT  

Making Medical Journals More Readable
Springer
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:19-19.
ABSTRACT