 |
|
Cosmetic Tattoo Ink DarkeningA Complication of Q-Switched and Pulsed-Laser Treatment
R. Rox Anderson, MD;
Roy Geronemus, MD;
Suzanne L. Kilmer, MD;
William Farinelli;
Richard E. Fitzpatrick, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(8):1010-1014.
Abstract
| |
Background
High-energy, short-pulse lasers, eg, Q-switched lasers, emitting visible and near-infrared light have recently been developed for removing tattoos, with little risk of scarring. The mechanisms of action, and possible adverse effects other than scarring and hypopigmentation, are not fully understood.
Observations
We describe five cases of pulsed-laser— induced, immediate, irreversible darkening of cosmetic, white, flesh (skin-color), and pink-red colored tattoos. Irreversible ink darkening can be an insidious complication, because immediate whitening of the skin temporarily obscures the subsequently impressive color change. Among these cases, irreversible ink darkening occurred with Q-switched ruby (694 nm), Q-switched neodymium (Nd):YAG (1064 nm/532 nm), and pulsed green dye (510 nm) lasers. Attempts to remove the darkened ink with further laser treatment failed in two cases, and surgical excision was necessary. In the other three cases, subsequent laser treatments successfully removed the darkened ink. The red cosmetic tattoo ink used in one of the cases was placed in agar in vitro and was converted to a black compound immediately on Q-switched ruby laser exposure. Ferric oxide, a brown-red ingredient commonly used in cosmetic tattoos, was similarly tested and blackened in vitro by Q-switched ruby laser exposures.
Conclusions
Although most tattoos are not darkened by laser treatment, short-pulsed lasers over a wide spectrum can cause immediate darkening of some tattoo inks. Patients should be warned of the potential for irreversible cosmetic tattoo darkening, and test-site exposures should be performed prior to treatment. In some cases, subsequent laser treatments may remove the blackened ink. The mechanism probably involves, at least for some tattoos, reduction of ferric oxide (Fe2O3, "rust") to ferrous oxide (FeO, jet black), but the chemical reaction that is involved remains unknown.
(Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1010-1014)
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Dermatology, Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Drs Anderson and Kilmer and Mr Farinelli); and the New York (NY) University (Dr Geronemus); and Dermatology Associates of San Diego, Encinitas, Calif (Dr Fitzpatrick).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
A Review of the Principles and Use of Lasers in Lower Limb Problems
Cotton
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2004;3:133-142.
ABSTRACT
Q-Switched Laser-Induced Chrysiasis Treated With Long-Pulsed Laser
Yun et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1012-1014.
FULL TEXT
In Vitro Quantitative Chemical Analysis of Tattoo Pigments
Timko et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:143-147.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Regarding Tattoos: Is That Sunlight, or an Oncoming Train at the End of the Tunnel?
Anderson
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:210-212.
FULL TEXT
Tattoo Darkening and Nonresponse After Laser Treatment: A Possible Role for Titanium Dioxide
Ross et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:33-37.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laser Treatment of Pigmented Lesions-2000: How Far Have We Gone?
Stratigos et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:915-921.
FULL TEXT
Motivation for Tattoo Removal
Armstrong et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:412-416.
ABSTRACT
Localized Chrysiasis Induced by Laser Therapy
Trotter et al.
Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1411-1414.
ABSTRACT
Dermatology
Dover and Arndt
JAMA 1995;273:1668-1670.
ABSTRACT
Lasers in Dermatology--1993
Hruza et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1026-1035.
ABSTRACT
|
