This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Controlled, Dose-Response Study

Suzanne L. Kilmer, MD; Margaret S. Lee; Joannes M. Grevelink, MD; Thomas J. Flotte, MD; R. Rox Anderson, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(8):971-978.

Abstract
Background and Design
The Q-switched ruby laser was recently shown to remove tattoos without scarring. The Q-switched neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, which targets black ink with a longer wavelength that has less absorption by melanin, should effectively treat tattoos with fewer pigmentary alterations. A prospective, blinded, controlled study was conducted to assess the ability of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 10 ns, 5 Hz) to remove tattoos. Twenty-five patients with 39 blue-black or multicolored tattoos (14 previously untreated, 25 Q-switched ruby laser-resistant) were exposed in randomly derived quadrants with 6, 8, 10, or 12 J/cm² at 3 to 4 week intervals for a total of four treatment sessions.

Results
An excellent response (>75% ink removal) was seen in 77% of the black tattoos and more than 95% of the black ink cleared in 11 (28%) of 39 tattoos at 10 to 12 J/cm² after four treatment sessions. Colored inks were not as effectively removed. Response was related to fluence with greatest improvement noted in the quadrants treated with 10 and 12 J/cm². No significant side effects, including pigmentary changes or scarring, were noted. Histopathologic examination demonstrated persistence of tattoo ink in clinically clear areas and confirmed the absence of fibrosis and granulomatous changes.

Conclusion
The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) effectively treats black tattoos with an excellent cosmetic outcome. Bright colors were minimally responsive to treatment. Higher doses were more effective and equally well tolerated.

(Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:971-978)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lasers and Optical Technologies in Facial Plastic Surgery
Wu and Wong
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:381-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regarding Tattoos: Is That Sunlight, or an Oncoming Train at the End of the Tunnel?
Anderson
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:210-212.
FULL TEXT  

Scarring Following Q-Switched Laser Treatment of "Double Tattoos"
Alora et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:269-270.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Responses of Tattoos to Picosecond and Nanosecond Q-Switched Neodymium:YAG Lasers
Ross et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:167-171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minocycline-Induced Hyperpigmentation: Treatment With the Neodymium:YAG Laser
Wilde et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1344-1346.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical and Histological Responses of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi After Single Treatment With Q-Switched Lasers
Grevelink et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:349-353.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Traumatic Tattoos With the Q-Switched Neodymium:YAG Laser
Suzuki
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:1226-1229.
ABSTRACT  

Skin Reflectance-Guided Laser Selections for Treatment of Decorative Tattoos
Hodersdal et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:403-407.
ABSTRACT  

Motivation for Tattoo Removal
Armstrong et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:412-416.
ABSTRACT  

Tattoo Removal Using the Alexandrite Laser
Fitzpatrick and Goldman
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:1508-1514.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Epidermal Pigmented Lesions With the Frequency-Doubled Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser: A Controlled, Single-Impact, Dose-Response, Multicenter Trial
Kilmer et al.
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:1515-1519.
ABSTRACT  

Cosmetic Tattoo Ink Darkening: A Complication of Q-Switched and Pulsed-Laser Treatment
Anderson et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1010-1014.
ABSTRACT  

Lasers in Dermatology--1993
Hruza et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1026-1035.
ABSTRACT