You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 1, January 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Studies
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Histopathologic Findings in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Isabel Bielsa, MD; Carmen Herrero, MD; Antonio Collado, MD; Albert Cobos, MD; Josep Palou, MD; José Maria Mascaró, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(1):54-58.


Abstract

Background and Design
The possible distinction between different types of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) based on histologic features has been largely debated. This study describes the histopathologic features of three distinct subsets of CLE: chronic, annular-subacute, and papulosquamous-subacute. Biopsy specimens from 92 patients with CLE were examined without the clinical diagnosis being known by the examiners. Of them, 36 clinically demonstated chronic CLE; 32, annular-subacute CLE; and 24, papulosquamous-subacute CLE.

Results
In chronic CLE, the dermal changes (basement membrane thickening, dermal colloid bodies, pilosebaceous atrophy, and periappendageal infiltrate) were more frequent, while in annular-subacute CLE, a more severe vacuolation of the basal layer and a greater number of epidermal colloid bodies were seen. In addition, pilosebaceous atrophy and more severe epidermal damage were almost exclusive to chronic CLE and annular-subacute CLE, respectively.

Conclusions
Although some histologic differences between chronic and annular-subacute CLE exist, histopathologic diagnosis of the CLE subsets can only be accurately established when pilosebaceous atrophy or necrosis of all epidermal layers is observed.

(Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:54-58)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Bielsa, Herrero, Palou, and Mascaró), Rheumatology (Dr Collado), and Biostatistics (Dr Cobos), Hospital Clínico, Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona (Spain).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pathology, immunopathology, and immunohistochemistry in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
David-Bajar and Davis
Lupus 1997;6:145-157.
 

Phototesting and photoprotection in LE
Walchner et al.
Lupus 1997;6:167-174.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.