You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Studies
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immunohistochemistry of Port-wine Stains and Normal Skin With Endothelium-Specific Antibodies PAL-E, Anti—ICAM-1, Anti—ELAM-1, and Anti—Factor VIIIrAg

Reinhard Neumann, MD; Helmut Leonhartsberger, MD; Robert Knobler, MD; Herbert Hönigsmann, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(7):879-883.


Abstract

Background and Design
Immunohistochemical analysis using four monoclonal antibodies specific for endothelium was performed to evaluate the possible role the endothelium may play in the pathogenesis of port-wine stains. In 11 patients with port-wine stains, biopsy specimens were obtained from involved and normal skin. On frozen tissue sections, we studied and compared the distribution and staining pattern of PAL-E, anti—intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), anti—endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (ELAM-1), and anti—factor VIIIrAg (FVIIIrAg), all recognizing specific epitopes of vascular endothelial cells.

Results
The PAL-E, anti-FVIIIrAg, and anti—ICAM-1 antibodies showed a similar distribution and staining pattern. The intensity of staining was equally strong with PAL-E and FVIIIrAg, while the expression of ICAM-1 was moderate. The ELAM-1 antibody exhibited only a weak expression in about 70% of evaluated specimens. No substantial differences in the intensity and distribution pattern of expression of these proteins could be demonstrated between normal skin and port-wine stains.

Conclusion
Our findings suggest that the abnormal vessel pathologic findings in port-wine stains are not due to defects associated with the endothelium. According to PAL-E antibody staining properties, port-wine stain vessels could be classified as capillaries and/or postcapillary venules and small veins.

(Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:879-883)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University of Vienna (Austria) Medical School.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.