You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Studies
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Regular Sunscreen Use on Vitamin D Levels in an Australian Population

Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Robin Marks, MBBS, MPH; Peter A. Foley, MBBS, BMedSci; Damien Jolley, MSc(Stats), MSc(Epidemiol); Kenneth R. Knight, BSc(Hons), PhD; Josephine Harrison, BApplSci; Sandra C. Thompson, MBBS, MPH, PhD, BMedSci

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(4):415-421.


Abstract

Background and Design
Studies published have suggested a possibility that regular use of sunscreen to prevent skin cancer may put the population, particularly elderly people, at risk of vitamin D deficiency. We aimed to determine whether regular use of sunscreens in the normal adult population, as recommended by public health authorities for the prevention of skin cancer, may put individuals at risk of vitamin D deficiency. A randomized double-blind control trial of the daily use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen (sun protection factor [SPF] 17) vs placebo cream over a summer period in Australia was conducted in 113 people aged 40 years and over, with sampling stratified by age. All participants had at least one solar keratosis. Serum samples taken at the beginning and at the end of the study were analyzed for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.

Results
Mean levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 rose significantly by the same amount in both groups over the period of the study (placebo, +12.8 mmol/L; sunscreen, + 11.8 mmol/L). Mean levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increased significantly in the pla- cebo group only (placebo, +10.8 pmol/L; sunscreen, +1.3 pmol/L), but for no subject in either group was the level of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 outside the reference range either at the start or at the end of the study. There were no significant differences by age, sex, and skin type in the change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 over the study period.

Conclusions
No person, including those aged 70 years and over, developed any vitamin D levels outside the normal reference range during the period of the study. The data suggest that over an Australian summer sufficient sunlight is received, probably through both the sunscreen itself and the lack of total skin cover at all times, to allow adequate vitamin D production in people who are recommended to use sunscreens regularly. More work is required to elucidate the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, particularly during the different seasons of the year.

(Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:415-421)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Marks, Foley, and Thompson) and Chemical Pathology (Mr Knight), St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria; Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria, Carlton (Dr Marks and Mr Jolley); Department of Chemical Pathology, Heidelberg (Victoria) Repatriation Hospital (Ms Harrison); and Health and Community Services Department, Melbourne, Victoria (Dr Thompson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Editorial: Photoprotection: does it work?
Ilchyshyn et al.
Lupus 2008;17:705-707.
 

Vitamin D Deficiency in Children and Its Management: Review of Current Knowledge and Recommendations
Misra et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:398-417.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunlight exposure assessment: can we accurately assess vitamin D exposure from sunlight questionnaires?
McCarty
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1097S-1101S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Point: Sunscreen Use Is a Safe and Effective Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention
Green and Williams
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1921-1922.
FULL TEXT  

Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
Cummins et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:500-507.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

COMMENTARY: Nutritional Rickets in Georgia
Tomashek et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:e45-e45.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunlight and health
Marks et al.
BMJ 1999;319:1066-1066.
FULL TEXT  

Are we really dying for a tan?
Ness et al.
BMJ 1999;319:114-116.
FULL TEXT  

The Case for Sunscreens: A Review of Their Use in Preventing Actinic Damage and Neoplasia
Naylor and Farmer
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1146-1154.
ABSTRACT  

Regular Use of Sunscreen on Vitamin D Levels
Holich et al.
Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1337-1338.
ABSTRACT  

Regular Use of Sunscreen on Vitamin D Levels-Reply
Marks
Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1338-1339.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.