You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 5, May 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Studies
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cultures of Skin Biopsy Tissue From Immunocompromised Patients With Cancer and Rashes

Mary-Margaret Chren, MD; Hillard M. Lazarus, MD; Robert A. Salata, MD; C. Seth Landefeld, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(5):552-555.


Abstract

Background and Design
Microbiological cultures of skin biopsy tissue are often recommended in immunocompromised patients with cancer and rashes, but in a previous study, they were usually sterile or grew clinically insignificant organisms. To examine the use and bacteriological results of these cultures more comprehensively, we reviewed records from all immunocompromised adults with cancer and acute rash on which skin biopsy was performed during 39 months on a bone marrow transplantation/acute leukemia unit of a university hospital (108 episodes of rash in 80 patients).

Results
Of the 158 cultures that were performed, one (1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 4%] ) was a true positive; 11 (7%; 95% CI, 3% to 13%) were false positive; 143 (91%; 95% CI, 87% to 95%) were true negative; and three (2%; 95% CI, 1% to 6%) were false negative. Thus, the sensitivity of culture was 0.25, and the specificity was 0.93. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the single pathogenic organism that grew, yet was judged to be a contaminant in three episodes. Among the 95 rashes in which fewer than four types of culture were performed, viral culture may have been helpful in one case (1%; 95% CI, 0% to 6%).

Conclusions
Cultures of skin tissue from immunocompromised cancer patients with rashes were often unable to diagnose infection or the absence of infection. Clinical judgment was crucial to the interpretation of culture results.

(Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:552-555)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (The Skin Diseases Research Center) (Dr Chren) and Medicine (Drs Lazarus, Salata, and Landefeld), University Hospitals of Cleveland, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Departments of Dermatology [Dr Chren] and Medicine [Drs Salata and Landefeld]), Cleveland, Ohio.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.