You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 5, May 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Studies
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Assessing the Preferences of Patients With Psoriasis

A Quantitative, Utility Approach

Kathryn A. Zug, MD; Benjamin Littenberg, MD; Richard D. Baughman, MD; Terry Kneeland, MPH; Robert F. Nease, PhD; Walt Sumner, MD; Gerald T. O'Connor, PhD; Rebecca Jones, MD; Elizabeth Morrison, MD; Robert Cimis, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(5):561-568.


Abstract

Background and Design
Patient preferences for health outcomes can be explicitly assessed and expressed in quantitative terms known as utilities. Three standard methods for utility assessment have been used to quantify patient preferences, but these methods have not previously been applied to skin disease. Eighty-seven patients with psoriasis from a tertiary medical center were interviewed, using an interactive, computer-based utility assessment questionnaire, U-Titer. Utilities for three categories of psoriasis severity and potential adverse outcomes of methotrexate therapy were assessed by the vertical rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble.

Results
Patients assigned a broad range of utilities for each of the health states. Utilities obtained by the vertical rating scale did not correlate well with utilities obtained by standard gamble or time trade-off methods. However, utilities assessed by standard gamble and time trade-off were not significantly different. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, and education were not correlated with utility and did not explain the variation. Indicators of the patients' disease severity were not predictive of utilities for the assessed health states. The relatively high utility for liver biopsy suggests that there is less patient aversion to the procedure than suspected.

Conclusions
Utilities, or quantitative measures of patient preferences for health states, are measurable and vary widely for mild, moderate, and severe psoriasis and possible adverse outcomes of methotrexate treatment. The process of elucidating individual patient utilities for various health outcomes can be used to incorporate patient preferences into the process of clinical decision making. Guidelines that are based solely on severity of symptoms, without input from patients on how they value such symptoms, must be questioned.

(Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:561-568)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Sections of Dermatology (Drs Zug, Baughman, Jones, and Morrison), Clinical Research (Drs Littenberg, O'Connor, and Kneeland), and Gastroenterology (Dr Cimis), and the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Drs Nease and Sumner), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. Currently, Dr Zug is with Emory University Department of Dermatology, Atlanta, Ga; Drs Littenberg and Nease are with the Program in General Medical Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Mo; Dr Sumner is with the Department of Family Practice, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington; and Dr Morrison is an intern in the Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Systematic Review: Health-State Utilities in Liver Disease: A Systematic Review
McLernon et al.
Med Decis Making 2008;28:582-592.
ABSTRACT  

iMPACT3: Internet-Based Development and Administration of Utility Elicitation Protocols
Lenert et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:464-474.
ABSTRACT  

Psoriasis From the Patient's Point of View
Finlay
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:352-353.
FULL TEXT  

Parents' Utilities for Outcomes of Occult Bacteremia
Bennett et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:43-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Development of Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Severe Plaque Form Psoriasis
Spuls et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1591-1596.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Methotrexate vs Goeckerman Therapy for Psoriasis: A Pilot Study
Chen et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1602-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reliability Testing of the Dermatology Index of Disease Severity (DIDS) An Index for Staging the Severity of Cutaneous Inflammatory Disease
Faust et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1443-1448.
ABSTRACT  

A 61-Year-Old Man With Psoriasis
Baughman
JAMA 1996;276:1421-1428.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.