You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 10, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (125)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Frequency and Morphologic Characteristics of Invasive Melanomas Lacking Specific Surface Microscopic Features

Scott W. Menzies, MBBS; Christian Ingvar, MD; Kerry A. Crotty, MBBS; William H. McCarthy, MBBS

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(10):1178-1182.


Abstract

Objectives
To create a simple diagnostic method for invasive melanoma with in vivo cutaneous surface microscopy (epiluminescence microscopy, dermoscopy, dermatoscopy) and to analyze the incidence and characteristics of those invasive melanomas that had no diagnostic features by means of hand-held surface microscopes.

Design
Pigmented skin lesions were photographed in vivo with the use of immersion oil. All were excised and reviewed for histological diagnosis. A training set of 62 invasive melanomas and 159 atypical nonmelanomas and a test set of 45 invasive melanomas and 119 atypical nonmelanomas were used. Images from the training set were scored for 72 surface microscopic features. Those features with a low sensitivity (0%) and high specificity (>85%) were used to create a simple diagnostic model for invasive melanoma.

Setting
All patients were recruited from the Sydney (Australia) Melanoma Unit (a primary case and referral center).

Patients
A random sample of patients whose lesions were excised, selected from a larger database.

Main Outcome Measures
Sensitivity and specificity of the model for diagnosis of invasive melanona.

Results
The model gave a sensitivity of 92% (98/107) and specificity of 71%. Of the 9 "featureless" melanomas the model failed to detect, 6 were pigmented and thin and had a pigment network. The other 3 were thicker, hypomelanotic lesions lacking a pigment network, some with prominent telangiectases, and all with only small areas of pigment. All featureless melanomas noted by the patients had a history of change in color, shape, or size.

Conclusions
Surface microscopy does not allow 100% sensitivity in diagnosing invasive melanoma and therefore cannot be used as the sole indicator for excision. Clinical history is an important consideration when featureless lesions are diagnosed.

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:1178-1182



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Sydney Melanoma Unit) (Drs Menzies and McCarthy) and Pathology (Dr Crotty), University of Sydney (Australia); and the Department of Surgery, University of Lund (Sweden) (Dr Ingvar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Using Dermoscopic Criteria and Patient-Related Factors for the Management of Pigmented Melanocytic Nevi
Zalaudek et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:816-826.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Significance of Eccentric and Central Hyperpigmentation, Multifocal Hyper/hypopigmentation, and the Multicomponent Pattern in Melanocytic Lesions Lacking Specific Dermoscopic Features of Melanoma
Arevalo et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1440-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopic Evaluation of Amelanotic and Hypomelanotic Melanoma
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1120-1127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Optimal Interval for and Sensitivity of Short-term Sequential Digital Dermoscopy Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Melanoma
Altamura et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:502-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time Required for a Complete Skin Examination With and Without Dermoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study
Zalaudek et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:509-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CASH Algorithm for Dermoscopy Revisited
Henning et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:554-555.
FULL TEXT  

Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging.
Kittler et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1113-1119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparative Performance of 4 Dermoscopic Algorithms by Nonexperts for the Diagnosis of Melanocytic Lesions
Dolianitis et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1008-1014.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Limitations of Dermoscopy in the Recognition of Melanoma
Skvara et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:155-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study
Burroni et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:1881-1886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dysplastic Nevi
Naeyaert and Brochez
NEJM 2003;349:2233-2240.
FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Simulating Seborrheic Keratosis: A Major Dermoscopy Pitfall
Argenziano et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:389-391.
FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopy of Pigmented Seborrheic Keratosis: A Morphological Study
Braun et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1556-1560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopy Allows Better Management of Nail Pigmentation
Tosti and Argenziano
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1369-1370.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the Ability of Patients to Identify Enlarging Melanocytic Nevi
Dawid et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:984-985.
FULL TEXT  

Short-term Digital Surface Microscopic Monitoring of Atypical or Changing Melanocytic Lesions
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1583-1589.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Dermoscopy (Epiluminescence Microscopy) Useful for the Diagnosis of Melanoma?: Results of a Meta-analysis Using Techniques Adapted to the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests
Bafounta et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1343-1350.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epiluminescence Microscopy Diagnostic Criteria With Follow-up Computer-Based Monitoring of "Less Suspicious" Lesions May Increase Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Melanoma While Maintaining Adequate Specificity
Menzies
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:378-379.
FULL TEXT  

Surface Microscopy of Pigmented Basal Cell Carcinoma
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1012-1016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Face-to-Face Diagnosis vs Telediagnosis of Pigmented Skin Tumors: A Teledermoscopic Study
Piccolo et al.
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1467-1471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Automated Epiluminescence Microscopy: Human vs Machine in the Diagnosis of Melanoma
Menzies
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1538-1540.
FULL TEXT  

Angioma Serpiginosum: A Report of 2 Cases Identified Using Epiluminescence Microscopy
Ohnishi et al.
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1366-1368.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultraviolet Radiation of Melanocytic Nevi: A Dermoscopic Study
Hofmann-Wellenhof et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:845-850.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 28-Year-Old Fair-Skinned Woman With Multiple Moles
Robinson
JAMA 1997;278:1693-1699.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.