You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  STUDIES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (66)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Drugs Associated With Bullous Pemphigoid

A Case-Control Study

Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, MD; Pascal Joly, MD; Catherine Picard-Dahan, MD; Philippe Bernard, MD; Loïc Vaillant, MD; Christine Pauwels, MD; Véronique Salagnac, MD; Catherine Lok, MD; Jean-Claude Roujeau, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(3):272-276.


Abstract



Background and Design
Bullous pemphigoid is the most frequent autoimmune blistering disease. It occurs in the elderly. The cause of this disease is unknown, but cases of bullous pemphigoid have been occasionally attributed to drug therapy. We conducted a multicenter prospective case-control study looking at the drugs used on a long-term basis before the onset of the disease in 116 incident cases of bullous pemphigoid and 216 control patients with malignant or benign skin tumors.

Results
Case patients and control patients received many drugs on a long-term basis (mean ± SD, 4.4±3.2 and 4.4±2.7 years, respectively). Two classes of drugs, neu-n roleptics and diuretics, were used more frequently by case patients than control patients. Neuroleptics were used by 15.5% of case patients and 8.3% of control patients (adjusted odds ratios, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 3.8). Diuretics were used by 36.2% of case patients and 24.5% of control patients (adjusted odds ratios, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9). Among neuroleptics, no specific drug emerged. The association with diuretics was only linked to aldosterone antagonists, which were taken by 12.9% of case patients and 4.6% of control patients (adjusted odds ratios, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 7.1).

Conclusions
These results suggest that some drug therapies may be a risk factor for bullous pemphigoid. The cause of this association should be further investigated.

(Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:272-276)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Université Paris XII, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil (Dr Bastuji-Garin); and the Departments of Dermatology, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen (Dr Joly); Hôpital Bichat, Paris (Dr Picard-Dahan); Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges (Dr Bernard); Hôpital Trousseau, Tours (Dr Vaillant); Hôpital de St Germain-en-Laye (Dr Pauwels); Hôpital Sébastopol, Reims (Dr Salagnac); Hôpital Sud, Amiens (Dr Lok); and Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil (Dr Roujeau), France.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Cause Bullous Pemphigoid in Diabetic Patients: Report of Two Cases
Pasmatzi et al.
Diabetes Care 2011;34:e133-e133.
FULL TEXT  

Anti-Bullous Pemphigoid 180 and 230 Antibodies in a Sample of Unaffected Subjects
Wieland et al.
Arch Dermatol 2010;146:21-25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Terbinafine-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid
Aksakal et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:1625-1627.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bullous Pemphigoid and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A New Clue for Understanding the Bullous Disease?
Chosidow et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:521-524.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.