You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  OBSERVATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (82)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chronic Radiodermatitis Following Cardiac Catheterization

Daniel A. Lichtenstein, MD; Laurent Klapholz, MD; Daniel A. Vardy, MD; Israel Leichter, MD; Maurice Mosseri, MD; Sydney N. Klaus, MD; Leon T. Gilead, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(6):663-667.


Abstract

Background
Fluoroscopy and cineradiography used during coronary angiography expose patients to some of the highest doses of ionizing radiation in diagnostic radiology. The possibility of radiation-induced damage has been discussed by several authors in the past. However, to the best of our knowledge, chronic radiation dermatitis caused by exposure to x-rays during cardiac catheterization has not been described.

Observations
We describe 4 patients in whom chronic radiodermatitis developed following multiple cardiac catheterizations and coronary angioplasties. The cumulative radiation doses to which these patients were exposed were retrospectively calculated to be a mean of 24.6 Gy per patient, with a range of 11.4 to 34.9 Gy.

Conclusions
Chronic radiodermatitis is a threat in patients undergoing multiple cardiac catheterizations and angioplasties. In susceptible patients, radiation doses as small as 11.4 Gy, which can sometimes be emitted during 1 or 2 procedures, are potentially harmful. Awareness and protective measures against this long-term side effect of cardiac catheterization should be encouraged.

(Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:663-667)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Lichtenstein, Klapholz, Vardy, Klaus, and Gilead), Radiology (Dr Leichter), and Cardiology (Dr Mosseri), Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Potential Irish dose reference levels for cardiac interventional examinations
D'HELFT et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2009;82:296-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fluoroscopy-Induced Chronic Radiation Skin Injury: A Disease Perhaps Often Overlooked
Frazier et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:637-640.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiosensitive Functional Dye: Clinical Application for Estimation of Patient Skin Dose
Suzuki et al.
Radiology 2006;239:541-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiation Doses from Venous Access Procedures
Storm et al.
Radiology 2006;238:1044-1050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skin doses to patients undergoing coronary angiography in a Greek hospital
Delichas et al.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;113:449-452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures
Kuon et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2003;76:406-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fluoroscopy-Induced Skin Necrosis
Lee et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:140-142.
FULL TEXT  

Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures
Vano et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2001;74:1023-1031.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 1, Characteristics of Radiation Injury
Koenig et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:3-11.
FULL TEXT  

Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 Cases and Recommendations for Minimizing Dose Delivered to Patient
Koenig et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:13-20.
FULL TEXT  

Fluoroscopy: Patient Radiation Exposure Issues
Mahesh
RadioGraphics 2001;21:1033-1045.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Adult Diagnostic Neuroangiography
Cooperative Study between the ASNR ASITN, and the
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:146-150.
FULL TEXT  

Severe Skin Reactions from Interventional Fluoroscopy: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Wagner et al.
Radiology 1999;213:773-776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporary Hair Loss Simulating Alopecia Areata After Endovascular Surgery of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Report of 3 Cases
Tosti et al.
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1555-1556.
FULL TEXT  

Chronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterisation: a report of two cases and a brief review of the literature
Dehen et al.
Heart 1999;81:308-312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures
Cusma et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:427-435.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermatitis, etc., from X-rays
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:159-159.
ABSTRACT  

Radiodermatitis Following Cardiac Catheterization
D'Incan et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:242-243.
ABSTRACT  

Radiation Dermatitis from Cardiac Catheterization
Journal Watch Dermatology 1996;1996:12-12.
FULL TEXT  

Radiation Injury to Skin Following Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures
Malkinson
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:695-696.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.