This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (13)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Neal S. Penneys, MD, PhD, MBA

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(9):1053-1056.

Abstract
Background and Design
Managed care organizations may direct dermatopathologic specimens to anonymous consultants. I hypothesized that the quality of the consultation decreases when there is no incentive for an anonymous consultant to actively pursue the dermatologist/consumer. Therefore, I examined 364 consecutive specimens that had been directed to anonymous consultants. The specimens were obtained from patients who consulted a university-based dermatology clinic or the office of a collaborating practitioner. The quality of consultation was evaluated in 5 areas: factual correctness, arguable differences in degree, evidence that the history had been read by the consultant, knowledge of dermatologic disease evident in the interpretative aspects of the report, and appropriate direct interaction with the referring physician when indicated.

Results
There was concordance between the interpretation by anonymous consultants and the findings of my review in 66.8% of cases that involved common dermatopathologic diagnoses. There were errors in fact in 26 cases (7.1%). There were examples of failure to correlate histologic findings with clinical history, apparent lack of understanding of dermatologic disease, and failure to resolve conflicts between the histologic pattern and the clinical information.

Conclusions
I found a decrease in the quality of biopsy specimen interpretation received from anonymous consultants. Dermatologists need to maintain and/or upgrade their skills in dermatopathology to supervise the quality of interpretation obtained from anonymous consultants.

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:1053-1056

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, St Louis University Health Sciences Center, St Louis, Mo.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Histopathologic Misdiagnoses and Their Clinical Consequences
Olhoffer et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1381-1383.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:144-158.
 

Dermatopathology in Europe: Dreams and Realities
Kerl
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:21-24.
FULL TEXT  

Diminishing Gross and Microscopic Text in Skin Pathology Reports
Penneys
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1037-1037.
FULL TEXT  

Managed Care: A Cautionary Note
Ling
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:391-391.
ABSTRACT