You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 9, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REVIEW
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Case for Sunscreens

A Review of Their Use in Preventing Actinic Damage and Neoplasia

Mark F. Naylor, MD; Kevin C. Farmer, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(9):1146-1154.


Abstract

Background
Recent controversy surrounding sunscreens has stimulated a reexamination of their use. The purposes of this article are to weigh the evidence regarding the value of sunscreens in preventing actinic damage and neoplasia and to evaluate the merit of objections that have been raised against their use for this purpose. Scientific aspects of damage from UV light, neoplasia, and sunscreens are reviewed. The value of sunscreen use in preventing actinic damage is discussed and a number of sunscreen controversies are revisited.

Observations
The evidence favors the safety and efficacy of sunscreens for the prevention of actinic damage, melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Conclusion
Sunscreens continue to be a practical and useful tool for the prevention of actinic damage and neoplasia.

Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1146-1154



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, Center for Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine (Dr Naylor), and the Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy (Dr Farmer), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Promoting Sun Safety Among US Postal Service Letter Carriers: Impact of a 2-Year Intervention
Mayer et al.
AJPH 2007;97:559-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial
Autier et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1304-1309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

More About: Sunscreen Use, Wearing Clothes, and Number of Nevi in 6- to 7-Year-Old European Children
Elwood and Gallagher
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1164a-1166a.
FULL TEXT  

Sunscreens
Rieger
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1297-1297.
FULL TEXT  

Do sunscreens prevent skin cancer?
DTB 1998;36:49-51.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Case for Sunscreens Revisited
Autier et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:509-511.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.