 |
|
The Case for SunscreensA Review of Their Use in Preventing Actinic Damage and Neoplasia
Mark F. Naylor, MD;
Kevin C. Farmer, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(9):1146-1154.
Abstract
Background
Recent controversy surrounding sunscreens has stimulated a reexamination of their use. The purposes of this article are to weigh the evidence regarding the value of sunscreens in preventing actinic damage and neoplasia and to evaluate the merit of objections that have been raised against their use for this purpose. Scientific aspects of damage from UV light, neoplasia, and sunscreens are reviewed. The value of sunscreen use in preventing actinic damage is discussed and a number of sunscreen controversies are revisited.
Observations
The evidence favors the safety and efficacy of sunscreens for the prevention of actinic damage, melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer.
Conclusion
Sunscreens continue to be a practical and useful tool for the prevention of actinic damage and neoplasia.
Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1146-1154
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, Center for Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine (Dr Naylor), and the Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy (Dr Farmer), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial
Autier et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1304-1309.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
More About: Sunscreen Use, Wearing Clothes, and Number of Nevi in 6- to 7-Year-Old European Children
Elwood and Gallagher
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1164a-1166a.
FULL TEXT
Sunscreen Use, Wearing Clothes, and Number of Nevi in 6- to 7-Year-Old European Children
Autier et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1870-1872.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sunscreens
Rieger
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1297-1297.
FULL TEXT
Do sunscreens prevent skin cancer?
DTB 1998;36:49-51.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Case for Sunscreens Revisited
Autier et al.
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:509-511.
FULL TEXT
|
