You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Review
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evidence-Based Medicine in a Nutshell

A Guide to Finding and Using the Best Evidence in Caring for Patients

Michael Bigby, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1609-1618.

Evidence-based medicine is the use of the best current evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Practicing EBM requires recognition that in most encounters with patients, questions arise that should be answered to provide the patient with the best available medical care. Asking well-built clinical questions that contain 4 elements—a patient or problem, an intervention, a comparison intervention (if necessary), and an outcome—is an important step in practicing EBM. Once appropriate questions have been formulated, the best source for finding most types of best evidence is by searching the MEDLINE database by computer. MEDLINE searches have inherent software and operator limitations that make their reliability quite variable. One should be aware of these limitations and improve one's skills in searching. The Cochrane Collaboration Controlled Clinical Trials Registry contains more than 190,000 controlled clinical trials and is the best source of evidence about treatment. The quality (strength) of evidence is based on a hierarchy of evidence: results of systematic reviews of well-designed clinical studies, results of 1 or more well-designed clinical studies, results of large case series, expert opinion, and personal experience. Once the best evidence has been found, the EBM approach involves critically appraising the quality of the evidence, determining its magnitude and precision, and applying it to the specific patient. Guidelines to critically appraise and apply evidence are available. The clinical question, best evidence, and its critical appraisal should be saved in a format that can be easily retrieved for future use.


From the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does Isotretinoin Increase the Risk of Depression?
Bigby
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1197-1199.
FULL TEXT  

Accessible Evidence-Based Medicine: Critically Appraised Topics
Barzilai and Weinstock
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1189-1190.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Costs for Onychomycosis Treatments: A Practitioner's Perspective
Warshaw
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2006;96:38-52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Four Cornerstones of Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work
Gilgun
Research on Social Work Practice 2005;15:52-61.
ABSTRACT  

Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Bigby and Williams
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:795-798.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Evidence-Based Dermatology and Evidence-Based Internal Medicine Curricula in US Residency Training Programs: A National Survey
Dellavalle et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:369-372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence in Upheaval: Incorporating Observational Data Into Clinical Practice
Ray
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:249-254.
FULL TEXT  

What Proportion of Dermatological Patients Receive Evidence-Based Treatment?
Abeni et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:771-776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Is the Evidence for a Sunscreen and Melanoma Controversy?
Rigel et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1447-1449.
FULL TEXT  

Methods for Diagnosing Onychomycosis: A Comparative Study and Review of the Literature
Lawry et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1112-1116.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confidence Intervals
Bigby
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:386-387.
FULL TEXT  

Paradigm Lost
Bigby
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:26-27.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis: Where Do We Go From Here?
Williams
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:583-586.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.