You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 9, September 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Bullous Diseases
 •Diagnosis
 •Pemphigoid
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Clinical Criteria for Diagnosis of Bullous Pemphigoid

Loïc Vaillant, MD; Philippe Bernard, MD, PhD; Pascal Joly, MD, PhD; Catherine Prost, MD, PhD; Bruno Labeille, MD; Christophe Bedane, MD, PhD; Brigitte Arbeille, MD; Elisabeth Thomine, MD; Philippe Bertrand, MD; Catherine Lok, MD; Jean-Claude Roujeau, MD; for the French Bullous Study Group

Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1075-1080.

Objective  To check the potential usefulness of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid when state-of-the-art techniques such as Western immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin or direct immunoelectron microscopy are not available.

Design  Comparison of the clinical criteria between 2 groups (with and without bullous pemphigoid) as defined by immunoelectron microscopy used as standard criterion, in a prospective study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out by including all items that were statistically significant (at P<.05 level) in univariate analysis.

Setting  Five dermatology departments in teaching hospitals.

Patients  The 231 patients studied had subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases with linear IgG or C3 deposits in the basement membrane zone (157 with bullous pemphigoid, 33 with cicatricial pemphigoid, 30 with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, 5 with lupus erythematosus, and 6 others). A second set of patients was used to calculate predictive values.

Results  The multivariate logistic stepwise analysis resulted in a final set of predictors that included only 4 items: absence of atrophic scars, absence of head and neck involvement, absence of mucosal involvement, and age greater than 70 years. No additional variables met the .05 significance level to enter into the model. If 3 of these 4 characteristics were present, a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid could be made with a sensitivity of 90% and a specifity of 83%; these predictive values were calculated on a sample of 70 new cases.

Conclusions  With an estimated incidence of bullous pemphigoid among subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases of 80%, the presence of 3 of the 4 significant criteria allows the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, with a positive predictive value of 95%. Our set of' clinical criteria thus allows the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid with good validity for both clinical practice and therapeutic trials.


From the Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours, France (Dr Vaillant); Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges, France (Drs Bernard and Bedane); Departments of Dermatology (Dr Joly) and Pathology (Dr Thomine), Hôpital C. Nicolle, Rouen, France; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France (Dr Prost); Department of Dermatology, Hôpital H. Mondor, Créteil, France (Dr Roujeau); Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Sud, Amiens, France (Drs Labeille and Lok); and Departments of Electron Microscopy (Dr Arbeille) and Biostatistics (Dr Bertrand), Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Bullous Pemphigoid: The Latest in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy
Neil J. Korman
Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(9):1137-1141.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk Factors for Relapse in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid in Clinical Remission: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study
Bernard et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:537-542.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Oral Methylprednisolone Plus Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid
Beissert et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1536-1542.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prediction of Survival for Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid: A Prospective Study
Joly et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:691-698.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methotrexate for Bullous Pemphigoid: Preliminary Study
Bara et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1506-1507.
FULL TEXT  

Oral and Topical Corticosteroids in Bullous Pemphigoid
Korman et al.
NEJM 2002;347:143-145.
FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Oral and Topical Corticosteroids in Patients with Bullous Pemphigoid
Joly et al.
NEJM 2002;346:321-327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bullous Pemphigoid Therapy -- Think Globally, Act Locally
Stern
NEJM 2002;346:364-367.
FULL TEXT  

Bullous Pemphigoid: The Latest in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy
Korman
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1137-1141.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.