You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 10, October 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (100)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas

Monique R. T. M. Thissen, MD; Martino H. A. Neumann, MD, PhD; Leo J. Schouten, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1177-1183.

Objective  To systematically review the literature for studies reporting on recurrence rates of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) after different therapies.

Design  We reviewed all studies published in English, French, German, Dutch, Spanish, or Italian between 1970 and 1997 that prospectively examined recurrence rates for at least 50 patients with primary BCCs observed for at least 5 years after treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery, surgical excision, curettage and electrodesiccation, cryosurgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy with interferon or fluorouracil, or photodynamic therapy.

Setting  Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the reference center for dermatologic oncology and Mohs micrographic surgery in the Netherlands.

Main Outcome Measures  The recurrence rates after different therapies for BCCs, resulting in the development of guidelines for the treatment of these disorders.

Results  Of 298 studies found in several electronic databases, only 18 met the requirements and could be used for analysis. Tumors treated with Mohs micrographic surgery show the lowest recurrence rates after 5 years, followed in order by those treated with surgical excision, cryosurgery, and curettage and electrodesiccation.

Conclusions  Recurrence rates for different therapies could not be compared because of a lack of uniformity in the method of reporting, so evidence-based guidelines could not be developed. We surmise that Mohs micrographic surgery should be used mainly for larger, morphea-type BCCs located in danger zones. For smaller BCCs of the nodular and superficial types, surgical excision remains the first treatment of choice. Other treatment modalities can be used in patients in whom surgery is contraindicated. Immunotherapy and photodynamic therapy are still investigative.


From the Department of Dermatology, University of Maastricht Medical Center (Drs Thissen and Neumann), and the Department of Cancer Registration and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Limburg (Dr Schouten), Maastricht, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Pathologist's View
Juan Rosai
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(10):1171-1173.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mohs Surgery: The Informed View
Thomas W. McGovern and David J. Leffell
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(10):1255-1259.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Small margin excision of periocular basal cell carcinomas
Chadha and Wright
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:803-806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Prospective Trial of Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate Photodynamic Therapy vs Surgery for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
Rhodes et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1131-1136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Surgical Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face.
Essers et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:187-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determining the value of surgical therapies for Basal cell carcinoma.
Chren
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:231-232.
FULL TEXT  

Basal-Cell Carcinoma.
Rubin et al.
NEJM 2005;353:2262-2269.
FULL TEXT  

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin: systematic review
Bath-Hextall et al.
BMJ 2004;329:705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antitumor Activity of 3-Ingenyl Angelate: Plasma Membrane and Mitochondrial Disruption and Necrotic Cell Death
Ogbourne et al.
Cancer Res. 2004;64:2833-2839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photodynamic Therapy Using Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate vs Surgery for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial
Rhodes et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:17-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Keratinocyte Carcinoma
Albert and Weinstock
CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:292-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Appropriateness of Curettage and Electrodesiccation for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinomas
Alexiades-Armenakas et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:800-800.
FULL TEXT  

Mohs Surgery: The Informed View
McGovern and Leffell
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1255-1259.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.