You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 11, November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Leukemias/ Lymphomas
 •Immunology
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Prospective Study of Cutaneous Intolerance to Topical Mechlorethamine Therapy in Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas

Eric Estève, MD; Martine Bagot, MD, PhD; Pascal Joly, MD, PhD; Pierre Souteyrand, MD, PhD; Marie Beylot-Barry, MD; Loic Vaillant, MD, PhD; Michèle Delaunay, MD; Marie Françoise Avril, MD; Liliane Laroche, MD, PhD; Florent Grange, MD; Elisabeth Thomine, MD; Janine Wechsler, MD, PhD; for the French Study Group of Cutaneous Lymphomas

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1349-1353.

Objective  To study the exact frequency and the histological features of cutaneous intolerance to mechlorethamine (CIM) hydrochloride therapy in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Design  A multicenter prospective study was conducted from January 1, 1994, to May 31, 1996, in 12 different hospitals in France.

Patients  Of the 52 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas or Langerhans cell histiocytosis, 35 were men and 17 were women, aged 18 to 87 years. Of the 52 patients, 35 had mycosis fungoides, 8 had nonepidermotropic cutaneous lymphoma, 7 had lymphomatoid papulosis, 1 had Sézary syndrome, and 1 had Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Methods  Patients were treated with topical applications of a 0.02% aqueous solution of mechlorethamine. The diagnosis of CIM was determined by the presence of erythema and pruritus. Patients who developed CIM underwent closed patch testing with three 10-fold dilutions of 0.02% mechlorethamine solution. A positive patch test result was the presence of erythema and pruritus, a weak result was the presence of simple erythema without pruritus, and a negative result was the absence of erythema and pruritus. Skin biopsy specimens from patients with positive patch test results were obtained in patients who developed CIM. The biopsy specimens were reviewed, and the results determined by 2 pathologists (E.T. and J.W.). The histopathological findings were classified in 3 categories: (1) spongiotic dermatitis, (2) irritant dermatitis, and (3) insignificant or normal. In September 1998, the referring physicians were contacted if mechlorethamine therapy had been continued in patients with CIM.

Results  Of the 52 patients, 43 were evaluated for tolerance to mechlorethamine therapy. Of the 43 patients, CIM developed in 23, from 4 days to 9 months after the initiation of mechlorethamine therapy. Of those 23 patients, CIM developed within 3 months in 21 and within 1 month in 13. Closed patch tests were performed in 21 of the 23 patients who developed CIM. The results of the patch test were positive in 12, weak in 4, and negative in 5. Of these 21 patients, 14 skin biopsy specimens were obtained in 14 different patients who had positive or weak patch test results. The specimens showed histological features that were consistent with spongiotic dermatitis in 9 patients, irritant dermatitis in 2, and insignificant or normal in 3. All 9 patients with histological features of spongiotic dermatitis discontinued mechlorethamine therapy. All 5 patients without histological features of spongiotic dermatitis were able to resume mechlorethamine therapy. These results do not correlate with those of previous study results.

Conclusions  Mechlorethamine therapy is a cost-effective and easily administered treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Our study shows that allergic dermatitis caused by mechlorethamine therapy is an early and frequent adverse reaction in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. The most common histological feature of patients with CIM is spongiotic dermatitis.


From the Department of Dermatology, Hôpital R. Debré, Reims and Hôpital Porte Madeleine, Orléans (Dr Estève); the Departments of Dermatology (Dr Bagot) and Pathology (Dr Wechsler), Hôpital H. Mondor, Créteil; the Departments of Dermatology (Dr Joly) and Pathology (Dr Thomine), Hôpital C. Nicolle, Rouen; the Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand (Dr Souteyrand); Hôpital du Haut-Leveque, Pessac (Dr Beylot-Barry); Hôpital Trousseau, Tours (Dr Vaillant); Cente J. Perrin, Bordeaux (Dr Delaunay); Institut G. Roussy, Villejuif (Dr Avril); Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny (Dr Laroche); Hôpital L. Pasteur, Colmar (Dr Grange), France.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides With Twice-Weekly Applications of Mechlorethamine and Topical Corticosteroids: A Prospective Study
de Quatrebarbes et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1117-1120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Phase 1/2 Pilot Study of Methotrexate-Laurocapram Topical Gel for the Treatment of Patients With Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides
Demierre et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:624-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.