You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 12, December 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (57)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms
 •Nevi
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Digital Dermoscopy Analysis for the Differentiation of Atypical Nevi and Early Melanoma

A New Quantitative Semiology

Lucio Andreassi, MD; Roberto Perotti, MD; Pietro Rubegni, MD; Marco Burroni, PhD; Gabriele Cevenini, PhD; Maurizio Biagioli, MD; Paolo Taddeucci, MD; Giordana Dell'Eva, PhD; Paolo Barbini, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1459-1465.

Objectives  To use a digital dermoscopy analyzer with a series of "borderline" pigmentary skin lesions (ie, clinically atypical nevi and early melanoma) to find correlation between the studied variables and to determine their discriminating power with respect to histological diagnosis.

Design  A total of 147 pigmentary skin lesions were histologically examined by 3 experienced dermatopathologists and identified as nevi (n = 90) and melanomas (n = 57). The system evaluated 36 variables to be studied as possible discriminant variables, grouped into 4 categories: geometries, colors, textures, and islands of color.

Setting  University medical department.

Patients  A sample of patients with excised pigmentary skin lesions (nevi and melanomas).

Main Outcome Measures  Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model for evaluating "borderline" pigmentary skin lesions.

Results  After multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis, only 13 variables were selected to compute the canonical discriminant function.

Conclusion  The present method made it possible to determine which objective variables are important for distinguishing atypical benign pigmentary skin lesions and early melanoma.


From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Andreassi, Perotti, Rubegni, Burroni, Biagioli, and Taddeucci) and Cardiac Surgery and Biomedical Technology (Drs Cevenini and Barbini), University of Siena, and Biomedical Engineering Group (Dr Dell'Eva), Siena, Italy.


RELATED ARTICLES

Automated Epiluminescence Microscopy: Human vs Machine in the Diagnosis of Melanoma
Scott W. Menzies
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(12):1538-1540.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(12):1569-1570.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of Dermoscopy and Digital Dermoscopy Analysis in the Diagnosis of Pigmented Skin Lesions
Rubegni et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1444-1446.
FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study
Burroni et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:1881-1886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Computer Diagnosis of Melanoma: A Quantitative Meta-analysis
Rosado et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:361-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved Identification of Potentially Dangerous Pigmented Skin Lesions by Computerized Image Analysis
Jamora et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:195-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopy of Pigmented Seborrheic Keratosis: A Morphological Study
Braun et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1556-1560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Diagnosis by Computerized Analysis of Clinical Images
Lambert et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:377-377.
FULL TEXT  

Epiluminescence Microscopy: A Reevaluation of Its Purpose
Bystryn
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:377-378.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.