You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 6, June 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Laser Surgery
 •Dermatologic Laser Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

High-Intensity Flashlamp Photoepilation

A Clinical, Histological, and Mechanistic Study in Human Skin

Neil S. Sadick, MD; Christopher R. Shea, MD; James L. Burchette, Jr, HT(ASCP); Victor G. Prieto, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:668-676.

Objective  To examine the clinical, histological, and immunohistological effects of flashlamp photoepilation.

Design  Nonrandomized control trial with blinded histological study and follow-up of 1 to 20 months.

Setting  Private academic practice.

Subjects  Sixty-seven subjects (10 males and 57 females) with areas of excess body hair.

Interventions  Single (9 subjects) or multiple (58 subjects) treatments (noncoherent, 590-1200 nm, 2.9-3.0 milliseconds, 40-42 J/cm2) to hairy skin. From subjects given a single treatment, biopsy samples were taken immediately after treatment and at different intervals for up to 20 months.

Mean Outcome Measures  Clinical measures include hair counts and morphologic features before and after treatment. Histological measures include terminal-vellus and anagen-other ratios, hair shaft diameter, and morphologic features (routine and immunohistochemical detection of bcl-2, bax, p53, Ki67, cyclin D1, and hsp70) before and after treatment.

Results  Mean hair loss after photoepilation was 49%, 57%, and 54% for a single treatment and 47%, 56%, and 64% for multiple treatments at follow-up of less than 3 months, 3 to less than 6 months, and 6 months or longer, respectively (P<.05 for all comparisons). Transient erythema was seen in all subjects; no scarring occurred. Histologically, treatment caused morphologic damage confined to hair follicles and shafts. Terminal-vellus and anagen-telogen ratios, mean hair shaft diameter, and immunohistochemical profiles were not significantly modified by treatment. Treatment did not alter other skin adnexa, epidermis, or vessels.

Conclusions  Flashlamp treatment leads to significant, long-lasting epilation. The predominant mechanism seems to be via selective photothermal damage to large, pigmented hair follicles rather than induction of a programmed state of follicular cycle arrest or follicular miniaturization.


From the Department of Dermatology, New York Hospital–Cornell Medical Center, New York (Dr Sadick); and the Departments of Pathology (Drs Shea and Prieto and Mr Burchette) and Medicine (Drs Shea and Prieto), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(6):737-738.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-term Photoepilation Using a Broad-spectrum Intense Pulsed Light Source
Sadick et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1336-1340.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hair Removal with an Intense Pulsed Light Source
Journal Watch Dermatology 1999;1999:11-11.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.