You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 9, September 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of the 585-nm Flashlamp-Pumped Pulsed-Dye Laser and Silicone Gel Sheeting in Hypertrophic Scar Treatment

Gregory P. Wittenberg, MD; Brian G. Fabian, MD; Jodie L. Bogomilsky, MD; Lonni R. Schultz, PhD; Earl J. Rudner, MD; Marsha L. Chaffins, MD; Ghassan M. Saed, PhD; Robert L. Burns, MD; David P. Fivenson, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1049-1055.

Objective  To determine the efficacy of the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser and silicone gel sheeting in the treatment of hypertrophic scars in lighter- and darker-skinned patients.

Design  Prospective, single-blind, randomized, internally controlled, comparison investigation.

Setting  Large academic dermatology department.

Patients  Twenty patients with hypertrophic scars (19 completed the laser treatments and 18 completed the silicone gel sheeting treatments).

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical measurements included hypertrophic scar blood flow, elasticity, and volume. Patients' subjective complaints of pruritus, pain, and burning were also monitored. Histological assessment of fibrosis, number of telangiectasias, and number of mast cells was performed. Statistically significant improvements in clinical measurements and patients' subjective complaints determined treatment success.

Results  Mean scar duration was 32 months (range, 4 months to 20 years). There was an overall reduction in blood flow, volume, and pruritus over time (P=.001, .02, and .005, respectively). However, no differences were detected among treatment and control groups. There was no reduction in pain or burning (0-40 weeks), elasticity (8-40 weeks), or fibrosis (0-40 weeks, n=5 biopsies) in the treated or control sections of the scars. Unlike in a previous study, the number of mast cells in the scars was similar to the number of mast cells in healthy skin.

Conclusion  Clinical results demonstrate that the improvements in scar sections treated with silicone gel sheeting and pulsed-dye laser were no different than in control sections.


From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Wittenberg, Fabian, Bogomilsky, Rudner, Chaffins, Saed, Burns, and Fivenson) and Biostatistics (Dr Schultz), Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich. Dr Wittenberg is now with Rapid City Medical Center, Rapid City, SD.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(9):1139-1140.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laser treatment for skin problems
DTB 2004;42:73-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Review of the Principles and Use of Lasers in Lower Limb Problems
Cotton
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2004;3:133-142.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment Response of Keloidal and Hypertrophic Sternotomy Scars: Comparison Among Intralesional Corticosteroid, 5-Fluorouracil, and 585-nm Flashlamp-Pumped Pulsed-Dye Laser Treatments
Manuskiatti and Fitzpatrick
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1149-1155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulsed-Dye Laser for Hypertrophic Scars
Journal Watch Dermatology 1999;1999:8-8.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.