You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (46)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Frequency and Characteristics of Enlarging Common Melanocytic Nevi

Harald Kittler, MD; Markus Seltenheim, MD; Markus Dawid, MD; Hubert Pehamberger, MD; Klaus Wolff, MD, FRCP; Michael Binder, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:316-320.

Objective  To analyze the frequency and characteristics of enlarging common melanocytic nevi.

Design  Cohort study using digital epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) for documentation and follow-up, with a median follow-up interval of 11.4 months.

Setting  A dermatology department at a university hospital in Vienna, Austria.

Patients  One thousand six hundred twelve melanocytic nevi appearing clinically as common nevi, obtained from 385 patients (mean [±SD] age, 34.2 ± 14.8 y; 55.6% female).

Interventions  Follow-up examination and documentation by digital ELM.

Main Outcome Measures  Frequency of enlarging nevi according to age and comparison of ELM features observed in enlarging and nonenlarging nevi.

Results  Enlargement was found in 5.3% (n=86) of nevi. The frequency of enlarging nevi was inversely related to age (P<.001), in that enlarging nevi were common in patients younger than 20 years and relatively rare in older age groups. Epiluminescence microscopy revealed a peripheral rim of brown globules in 48.8% (n=42) of enlarging nevi. In contrast, a peripheral rim of brown globules was found in only 0.7% (n=11) of nevi without enlargement (P<.001). Enlarging nevi that were excised in children and adolescents showed no histological signs of atypia. In older age groups, 48.1% of excised enlarging nevi that were clinically diagnosed as common nevi showed some histological signs of atypia. None of the excised enlarging lesions was histologically diagnosed as melanoma.

Conclusions  The frequency of enlarging common nevi is inversely related to age. In the absence of clinical signs of atypia, enlargement alone does not indicate malignancy. A peripheral rim of brown globules is a characteristic ELM feature of symmetrically enlarging melanocytic nevi.


From the Division of General Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University of Vienna Medical School (Drs Kittler, Seltenheim, Dawid, Pehamberger, Wolff, and Binder), and Ludwig Boltzman Institute for Clinical and Experimental Oncology (Dr Pehamberger), Vienna, Austria. Drs Pehamberger, Wolff, and Binder have been involved in the development of the MoleMax II and serve as consultants to Derma Instruments, Vienna.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Common Acquired Nevomelanocytic Nevi and the Fourth Dimension
Arthur R. Rhodes
Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(3):400-405.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(3):438-439.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Using Dermoscopic Criteria and Patient-Related Factors for the Management of Pigmented Melanocytic Nevi
Zalaudek et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:816-826.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopic Changes in Acral Melanocytic Nevi During Digital Follow-up
Altamura et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1372-1376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopy Patterns of Halo Nevi
Kolm et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1627-1632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Framingham School Nevus Study: A Pilot Study
Oliveria et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:545-551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Digital Epiluminescence Microscopy Monitoring of High-Risk Patients
Robinson and Nickoloff
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:49-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Computer Diagnosis of Melanoma: A Quantitative Meta-analysis
Rosado et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:361-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopic Classification of Atypical Melanocytic Nevi (Clark Nevi)
Hofmann-Wellenhof et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1575-1580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-term Digital Surface Microscopic Monitoring of Atypical or Changing Melanocytic Lesions
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1583-1589.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risks and Benefits of Sequential Imaging of Melanocytic Skin Lesions in Patients With Multiple Atypical Nevi
Kittler and Binder
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1590-1595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopy and Early Diagnosis of Melanoma: The Light and the Dark
Carli et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1641-1644.
FULL TEXT  

Enlarging Common Melanocytic Nevi and the Diagnosis of Malignant Melanoma
Brodell et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:227-228.
FULL TEXT  

Changes Even in Benign Melanocytic Nevi
Braun et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:228-229.
FULL TEXT  

Common Acquired Nevomelanocytic Nevi and the Fourth Dimension
Rhodes
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:400-405.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.