 |
|
Waiting Times to See a Dermatologist Are Perceived as Too Long by Dermatologists
Implications for the Dermatology Workforce
Tina Suneja, MD;
Edward D. Smith;
G. John Chen, PhD;
Kory J. Zipperstein, MD;
Alan B. Fleischer, Jr, MD;
Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1303-1307.
Background The issue of workforce requirements in dermatology has come to attention in recent years because it affects the delivery of dermatologic care in the United States.
Objective To determine the waiting times for appointments with dermatologists in order to assess the adequacy of the current level of dermatology workforce.
Methods Waiting times were determined for new and return patient appointments by telephone survey of a random sample of American Academy of Dermatology members. Physicians' perception of the adequacy of the number of dermatologists in their area was used as a criterion standard to validate waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. Benchmark waiting times of 3 weeks for a new patient appointment and 2 weeks for a return appointment were established.
Results Physicians' estimates of the waiting time for a new patient appointment and their perceptions of the adequacy of the number of practicing dermatologists in their area were closely correlated (r = -0.65; P<.001), validating the use of waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. More than 60% of the dermatologists surveyed exceeded the criterion cutoff waiting times, and more than 42% of the US population lives in areas underserved by dermatologists. Dermatologists practicing in areas of higher population density were more likely to have shorter waiting times for new patient appointments and were more likely to include cosmetic dermatology in their practices.
Conclusion The long waiting times for appointments suggests that the current supply of dermatologists is not adequate to meet the demand for dermatologists' services.
From the Bristol Myers Squibb Center for Dermatology Research, Departments of Dermatology (Drs Suneja, Fleischer, and Feldman and Mr Smith) and Public Health Sciences (Dr Chen), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region, San Francisco (Dr Zipperstein).
RELATED ARTICLE
Too Few or Too Many Dermatologists?: Difficulties in Assessing Optimal Workforce Size
Jack Resneck, Jr
Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1295-1301.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Staying on Top in Dermatology: Why We Must Act Now to Address the Capacity Challenge
Watson and Kvedar
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:541-544.
FULL TEXT
Academic Dermatology Manpower: Issues of Recruitment and Retention
Loo et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:341-347.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Generational Differences in Practice Patterns of Dermatologists in the United States: Implications for Workforce Planning
Jacobson et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1477-1482.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Skin Biopsy Triage Decisions in 49 Patients With Pigmented Lesions and Skin Neoplasms: Store-and-Forward Teledermatology vs Face-to-Face Dermatology
Shapiro et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:525-528.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gender and Parenting Significantly Affect Work Hours of Recent Dermatology Program Graduates
Jacobson et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:191-196.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Too Few or Too Many Dermatologists?: Difficulties in Assessing Optimal Workforce Size
Resneck
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1295-1301.
FULL TEXT
|
