This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (14)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Rachel Neale, PhD; Gail Williams, PhD; Adèle Green, MB BS, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:1319-1325.

Background  Despite many investigations of sunscreen use, there have been few among adults in the community at large. Better understanding of sunscreen application patterns will lead to more strategic skin cancer prevention strategies among sun-exposed populations.

Objective  To explore patterns of sunscreen use, particularly the quantity of sunscreen used and the application frequency, among participants in a community-based sunscreen intervention.

Design  Follow-up of patterns of sunscreen use over 4.5 years.

Setting  Nambour, a subtropical town in Queensland, Australia.

Participants  People drawn randomly from the electoral register who were later randomized as part of a skin cancer prevention trial.

Interventions  Daily application of a standard sun protection factor 15+ broad-spectrum retail sunscreen to the head and neck, arms, and hands.

Outcome Measures  Frequency of application of sunscreen, weight of sunscreen applied, and quantity applied per unit area of skin.

Results  Fifty-six percent of participants reported applying sunscreen on at least 5 days per week, with 27% using sunscreen infrequently on 2 or fewer days per week. The median daily amount of sunscreen applied averaged over the duration of the trial was 1.5 g/d (range, 0-7.4 g/d). The median quantity of sunscreen applied was 0.79 mg/cm², which was less than half the amount needed to achieve the labeled sun protection factor.

Conclusions  It is possible to implement the daily application of sunscreen in sun-exposed populations, although protection would be increased if the quantity of sunscreen applied were greater.

From the Population and Clinical Sciences Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research (Drs Neale and Green), and Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition (School of Public Health), University of Queensland (Dr Williams), Brisbane, Australia.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Controlled Trial of Objective Measures of Sunscreen and Moisturizing Lotion
Elliott et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1399-1402.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral nicotinamide protects against ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression in humans
Yiasemides et al.
Carcinogenesis 2009;30:101-105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economic Evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency's SunWise Program: Sun Protection Education for Young Children
Kyle et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1074-e1084.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunscreen Use Before and After Transplantation and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated With Skin Cancer Development in Renal Transplant Recipients
Moloney et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:978-982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary prevention of skin cancer: a review of sun protection in Australia and internationally
Stanton et al.
HEALTH PROMOT INT 2004;19:369-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Photoaging
Stern
NEJM 2004;350:1526-1534.
FULL TEXT  

The Melanoma Epidemic: Res Ipsa Loquitur
Beddingfield
The Oncologist 2003;8:459-465.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT