You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 4, April 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Acne
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Successful Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Using a New Method

Results of a Randomized Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Short-Contact Therapy With 0.1% Tazarotene Gel

Susan Bershad, MD; Giselle Kranjac Singer, BS; Janice E. Parente, PhD; Mei-Heng Tan, MD; Daniel W. Sherer, MD; Andrea N. Persaud, MD; Mark Lebwohl, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:481-489.

Context  Short-contact application of 0.1% tazarotene gel for acne was devised to minimize local adverse effects. Its efficacy and safety are unknown.

Objectives  To assess acne improvement and tolerability during 12 weeks of short-contact treatment with 0.1% tazarotene gel vs a nonmedicated gel control.

Design  A randomized, masked, vehicle-controlled trial.

Setting  Outpatient facilities at an urban medical school and an affiliated suburban office practice.

Participants  Ninety-nine volunteers with facial acne were enrolled; 81 completed the study.

Intervention  Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to each of 3 groups: T + T applied 0.1% tazarotene gel twice daily, T + V applied 0.1% tazarotene gel once daily and vehicle gel once daily, and V + V applied vehicle gel twice daily. Patients adjusted the contact period as tolerated, between 30 seconds and 5 minutes per application.

Main Outcome Measures  Acne efficacy by reduction in acne lesions, treatment success (50%-100% improvement in global response to treatment) and improvement in overall disease severity. Local adverse effects, scored from none to severe.

Results  By week 12, T + T and T + V achieved significantly greater improvement in acne than V + V based on mean percentage reduction in noninflammatory lesions (46% and 41% vs 2%; P = .002) and inflammatory lesions (38% and 34% vs 9%; P = .01), percentage of treatment successes (64% and 61% vs 15%; P<.001), and reduction in overall disease severity (30% and 29% vs 3%; P<.001). Local adverse effects did not differ significantly among the 3 groups after week 4.

Conclusion  Short-contact 0.1% tazarotene gel therapy is a safe and effective new method of acne treatment.


From the Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Bershad, Tan, Sherer, Persaud, and Lebwohl and Ms Kranjac Singer); and Integrated Research Inc, Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec (Dr Parente). Dr Bershad holds US patents and reserves all rights to international patents for the short-contact method of topical retinoid therapy to treat acne, photoaging, and psoriasis (patents 6017938, 6048902, 6083963, and 6096765). She has received compensation for speaking engagements from Allergan Inc, Irvine, Calif. Dr Parente is a co-owner and managing director of Integrated Research Inc, which has received compensation for clinical research consulting services from Allergan Inc. Dr Lebwohl has received research grants and compensation for speaking engagements from Allergan Inc.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(4):553-554.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Haider and Shaw
JAMA 2004;292:726-735.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.